Наративне дослідження впливу навчання цифрового лідерства на навчальну мотивацію студентів-інженерів
Ключові слова:
адаптація, ефективність діяльності закладу освіти, комп’ютерне моделювання, гнучкість, інновація, співпраця, управління плануванням
Анотація
Метою цього дослідження було виявити бачення студентів-інженерів щодо впливу на- вчання лідерства в галузі цифрової трансфор- мації та його зв’язку з навчальною мотивацією.
Методи. У цьому дослідженні використано якісні методи для вивчення досвіду, поглядів та поведінки учасників у контексті навчання з цифрового лідерства, в якому вони брали участь. Методи збору даних включали на- півструктуровані інтерв’ю з трьома студента- ми-будівельниками, трьома студентами-елек- триками та трьома студентами-механіками, які взяли участь у навчанні з цифрового лі- дерства. Результати, проаналізовані з позиції студентів-інженерів, виявили чотири основні теми. Ці теми включали цифрову симуляцію як засіб підготовки до кар’єри, активну та спільну участь у навчанні, що сприяє вдосконаленню цифрових навичок, синергію з індустріаль- ним світом як платформу для розвитку про- фесійних компетенцій, а також навчання, що заохочує креативність та інновації для вирі- шення викликів на робочому місці. Дискусія і висновки. На основі результатів, отриманих з позиції студентів-інженерів, можна зробити декілька висновків. Цифрове моделювання є ефективним для зміцнення готовності до кар’єри. Активна та спільна участь у навчанні сприяє покращенню цифрових навичок. Крім того, синергія між освітою та промисловістю має вирішальне значення для розвитку робо- чих компетенцій. Нарешті, навчання, що зо- середжується на креативності та інноваціях, є ключем до адаптації до викликів сучасного динамічного робочого середовища. Цей вис- новок підкреслює, що розробка навчальних програм, які є контекстуальними, створеними на основі співпраці та орієнтованими на га- лузь, є важливою для ефективного підвищен- ня готовності молодого покоління до роботи.
Такий підхід гарантує, що студенти не лише отримують теоретичні знання, але й розвива- ють практичні компетенції та м’які навички, безпосередньо застосовні на сучасному робо- чому місці. Пропозиції для майбутніх дослід- жень полягають у аналізі рушійних і гальмів- них факторів навчальної мотивації студентів на основі цих чотирьох тем для покращення розробки та впровадження навчальних про- грам, а також для підвищення готовності сту- дентів-інженерів до динаміки промислових потреб в епоху цифрової трансформації.
Завантаження
Дані завантаження ще не доступні.
Посилання
Abbu H., Mugge P., Gudergan G., Hoeborn G., Kwiatkowski A. Measuring the Human Dimensions of Digital Leadership for Successful Digital Transformation: Digital leaders can use the authors’ Digital Leadership Scale to assess their own readiness and ability to accelerate digital transformation. Research-Technology Management. 2022. Vol. 65(3). P. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2022.2048588
Abdulcalder A. A Synthesized Model of Faculty Motivation in Saudi Arabia’s Higher Education Sector. In: Teaching and Learning in Saudi Arabia: Perspectives from Higher Education, edited by Amani K. Hamdan. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2015. P. 129–143. https://brill.com/display/book/9789463002059/BP000008.xml
Akour M., Alenezi M. Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12(11). P. 784. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Alboaouh K. The Gap Between Engineering Schools and Industry: A Strategic Initiative. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2018. P. 1–6. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Almeida D. J., Byrne A. M., Smith R. M., Ruiz S. How relevant is grit? The importance of social capital in first-generation college students’ academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 23(3). P. 539–559. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1521025119854688
Al-Omari A. A., Tineh AMA, Khasawneh SM. Leadership skills of first-year students at public universities in Jordan. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2008. Vol. 13(3). P. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740802354252
Al-Otaibi S. A, Yusof S. M., Ismail W. K. W. The Influence of Organizational Culture on Students’ Satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial engineering and operations management. 2019. P. 2195–2203. https://ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/688.pdf
Bagga S. K., Gera S., Haque S. N. The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2023. Vol. 28(2). P. 120–131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000355
Balwant P. T. ‘Keeping it real’ authentic instructor- leadership, student engagement and performance, and leader distance. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1657593
Bartolomé J., Garaizar P., Larrucea X. A pragmatic approach for evaluating and accrediting digital competence of digital profiles: a case study of entrepreneurs and remote workers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2022. Vol. 27(3). P. 843–878. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-021-09516-3
Benitez J., Arenas A., Castillo A., Esteves J. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information and Management. 2022. Vol. 59(2). P. 103590. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720622000027
Braun V., V. Clarke. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3(2). P. 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, 2016. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1948986
Buckley J., Adams L., Aribilola I., Arshad I., Azeem M., Bracken L., Zhang L. An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview- based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2022. Vol. 32(4). P. 1963–1982. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-021-09695-1
Butler G. Discipline-specific Versus Generic Academic Literacy Intervention for University Education: An Issue of Impact. Journal for Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 47(2). P. 71–88. https//doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.4
Bygstad B., Øvrelid E., Ludvigsen S., Dæhlen M. From dual digitalization to digital learning spaces: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education. 2022. Vol. 182. P. 104463. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131522000343
Christina H., Sorkos G. Students as informal leaders in deliberate acts of inclusion. Research Papers in Education. 2022. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065525
Clandinin D. J., Huber J. Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 436-441). Elsevier, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
Cohen J., Cook-Sather A., Lesnick A., Alter Z., Awkward R., Decius F., Mengesha L. Students as leaders and learners: Towards self-authorship and social change on a college campus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2013. Vol. 50(1). P. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746511
Dalakas V. Turning Guest Speakers’ Visits into Active Learning Opportunities. Atlantic Marketing Journal. 2016. Vol. 5(2). P. 93–99. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/amj/vol5/iss2/7/
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self- Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11(4). P. 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dev P. C. Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement. Remedial and Special Education. 1997. Vol. 18(1). P. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
Drysdale M. T. B., McBeath M. Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Learning Strategies of University Students Participating in Work-Integrated Learning. Journal of Education and Work. 2018. Vol. 31(5–6). P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1533240
Entwistle N. Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning. In: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck. Boston, MA: Plenum Press, 1988. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2
Goldberg J., Cariapa V., Corliss G., Kaiser K. Benefits of Industry Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2014. Vol. 30. P. 6–13. https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/157/
Gravett K., Kinchin I. M., Winstone N. E. ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 45(12). P. 2574–2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Ha N. T. N. The involvement of industry professionals and barriers to involvement in work-integrated learning: The case of the profession-oriented higher education framework in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Work. 2022. Vol. 35(1). P. 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2018408
Hanh N. V., Hop N. H. The Effectiveness of the Industrial Field Trip in Introduction to Engineering: A Case Study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018. Vol. 55(3). P. 273–289. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020720918773050
Harris A., Azorín C., Jones M. Network leadership: a new educational imperative. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1919320
Isomöttönen V., Daniels M., Cajander A., Pears, A., McDermott, R. Searching for Global Employability: Can Students Capitalize on Enabling Learning Environments? ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2019. Vol. 19(2). P. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277568
Jameson J., Rumyantseva N., Cai M., Markowski M., Essex R., McNay I. A systematic review, textual narrative synthesis and framework for digital leadership research maturity in Higher Education. Computers and Education Open. 2022. P. 100115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000428
Jensen R., Ottesen E. Unfolding teaching practices in higher education courses: Cases from school leadership programs. International Journal of Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 112. P. 101919. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035521001889
Karns G. L. An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education. 2005. Vol. 27(2). P. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305276641https://journals.sagepub.com/
doi/abs/10.1177/0273475305276641
Kodama C. M., Dugan J. P. Leveraging leadership efficacy for college students: Disaggregating data to examine unique predictors by race. Equity and Excellence in Education. 2013. Vol. 46(2). P. 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.780646
Larastie P., Barnett T., Hansen E. Leading with the heart and/or the head? Experiences of women student leaders in top world forestry universities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2020. Vol. 35(8). P. 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1825787
Maddikunta P. K. R., Pham Q. V., Prabadevi B., Deepa N., Dev K., Gadekallu TR, Liyanage M. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022. Vol. 26. P. 100257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452414X21000558
Magesa M. M., Jonathan J. Conceptualizing digital leadership characteristics for successful digital transformation: the case of Tanzania. Information Technology for Development. 2022. Vol. 28(4). P. 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1991872
McCarthy P., Sammon D., Alhassan I. Digital transformation leadership characteristics: A literature analysis. Journal of Decision Systems. 2022. Vol. 32(1). P. 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1908934
Mukminin A. From east to west: A phenomenological study of Indonesian graduate students’ experiences on the acculturation process at an American public research university. The Florida State University, 2012. https://www.proquest.com/openview/64fb3a67d3a866ad32ecfae7f8445f38/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Nghia T. L. H., My Duyen N. T. Internship-related learning outcomes and their influential factors: The case of Vietnamese tourism and hospitality students. Education+ training. 2018. Vol. 60(1). P. 69–81. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/et-02-2017-0030/full/html
Nupke P. Motivation: Theory and use in Higher Education. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning. 2012. Vol. 8. P. 11–17. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/314/
Owusu-Agyeman Y. Transformational leadership and innovation in higher education: A participative process approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 24(5). P. 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1623919
Pantzos P., Gumaelius L., Buckley J., Pears A. Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023. Vol. 48(1). P. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2093167
Patil R., J. Wagner T., Schweisinger R., Collins A. K., Gramopadhye, Hanna M. A Multi-Disciplinary Mechatronics Course with Assessment- Integrating Theory and Application Through Laboratory Activities. The International Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. Vol. 28(5). P. 1141–1149. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol28-5/16_ijee2632ns.pdf
Philip J., Gavrilova Aguilar M. Student perceptions of leadership skills necessary for digital transformation. Journal of Education for Business. 2022. Vol. 97(2). P. 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1890540
Rowe A., Zegwaard K. Developing Graduate Employability Skills and Attributes: Curriculum Enhancement through Work-integrated Learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2017. Vol. 18(2). P. 87–99. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/d76b1f4d-2284-42e5-9392-81bfa4770611/content
Russell G. M., Kelly N. H. Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203181
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000. Vol. 25(1). P. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Brick by Brick: The Origins, Development, and Future of Self-Determination Theory. In: Advances in Motivation Science. 6. Advances in Motivation Science, edited by AJ Elliot. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Inc, 2019. P. 111–156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221509191930001X
Schell W. J., Kauffmann P. J.. Engineering leadership: Faculty perceptions and profiles. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-faculty-perceptions-and-profiles
Shao Z., Li X., Luo Y., Benitez J. The differential impacts of top management support and transformational supervisory leadership on employees’ digital performance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2022. P. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147456
Siddiqui F.H., Abdekhodaee A., Thaheem M.J. Taxonomy of Digital Skills Needed in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 45th AUBEA Conference, Sydney, Australia. 2022. P. 23–25. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Jamaluddin-Thaheem/publication/365786910_Taxonomy_of_Digital_Skills_Needed_in_
the_Construction_Industry_A_Literature_Review/links/6384529e48124c2bc6
7a4fad/Taxonomy-of-Digital-Skills-Needed-in-the-Construction-Industry-A-Literature-Review.pdf
Susanto P. C., Sawitri N. N. Coaching, Mentoring, Leadership Transformation and Employee Engagement: A Review of the Literature. Dynasty International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2022. Vol. 4(2). P. 297–308. https://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/27969/1/PAPER%20DAB%20BUKTI
%20INDEKS%20%20COACHING_merged.pdf
Thompson S. A., Miller K. L. Disruptive trends in higher education: Leadership skills for successful leaders. Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2018. Vol. 34(2). P. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.008
Trowler V. Leadership practices for student engagement in challenging conditions. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 17(3). P. 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2013.789455
Van Laar E., van Deursen A. J., van Dijk J. A., de Haan J. Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in human behavior. 2019. Vol. 100. P. 93–104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563219302432
Wolter A., Kerst C. The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationship between vocational training and higher education in Germany. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2015. Vol. 10(4). P. 510–524. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1745499915612188
Abdulcalder A. A Synthesized Model of Faculty Motivation in Saudi Arabia’s Higher Education Sector. In: Teaching and Learning in Saudi Arabia: Perspectives from Higher Education, edited by Amani K. Hamdan. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2015. P. 129–143. https://brill.com/display/book/9789463002059/BP000008.xml
Akour M., Alenezi M. Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12(11). P. 784. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Alboaouh K. The Gap Between Engineering Schools and Industry: A Strategic Initiative. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2018. P. 1–6. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Almeida D. J., Byrne A. M., Smith R. M., Ruiz S. How relevant is grit? The importance of social capital in first-generation college students’ academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 23(3). P. 539–559. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1521025119854688
Al-Omari A. A., Tineh AMA, Khasawneh SM. Leadership skills of first-year students at public universities in Jordan. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2008. Vol. 13(3). P. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740802354252
Al-Otaibi S. A, Yusof S. M., Ismail W. K. W. The Influence of Organizational Culture on Students’ Satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial engineering and operations management. 2019. P. 2195–2203. https://ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/688.pdf
Bagga S. K., Gera S., Haque S. N. The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2023. Vol. 28(2). P. 120–131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000355
Balwant P. T. ‘Keeping it real’ authentic instructor- leadership, student engagement and performance, and leader distance. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1657593
Bartolomé J., Garaizar P., Larrucea X. A pragmatic approach for evaluating and accrediting digital competence of digital profiles: a case study of entrepreneurs and remote workers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2022. Vol. 27(3). P. 843–878. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-021-09516-3
Benitez J., Arenas A., Castillo A., Esteves J. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information and Management. 2022. Vol. 59(2). P. 103590. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720622000027
Braun V., V. Clarke. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3(2). P. 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, 2016. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1948986
Buckley J., Adams L., Aribilola I., Arshad I., Azeem M., Bracken L., Zhang L. An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview- based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2022. Vol. 32(4). P. 1963–1982. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-021-09695-1
Butler G. Discipline-specific Versus Generic Academic Literacy Intervention for University Education: An Issue of Impact. Journal for Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 47(2). P. 71–88. https//doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.4
Bygstad B., Øvrelid E., Ludvigsen S., Dæhlen M. From dual digitalization to digital learning spaces: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education. 2022. Vol. 182. P. 104463. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131522000343
Christina H., Sorkos G. Students as informal leaders in deliberate acts of inclusion. Research Papers in Education. 2022. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065525
Clandinin D. J., Huber J. Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 436-441). Elsevier, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
Cohen J., Cook-Sather A., Lesnick A., Alter Z., Awkward R., Decius F., Mengesha L. Students as leaders and learners: Towards self-authorship and social change on a college campus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2013. Vol. 50(1). P. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746511
Dalakas V. Turning Guest Speakers’ Visits into Active Learning Opportunities. Atlantic Marketing Journal. 2016. Vol. 5(2). P. 93–99. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/amj/vol5/iss2/7/
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self- Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11(4). P. 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dev P. C. Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement. Remedial and Special Education. 1997. Vol. 18(1). P. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
Drysdale M. T. B., McBeath M. Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Learning Strategies of University Students Participating in Work-Integrated Learning. Journal of Education and Work. 2018. Vol. 31(5–6). P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1533240
Entwistle N. Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning. In: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck. Boston, MA: Plenum Press, 1988. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2
Goldberg J., Cariapa V., Corliss G., Kaiser K. Benefits of Industry Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2014. Vol. 30. P. 6–13. https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/157/
Gravett K., Kinchin I. M., Winstone N. E. ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 45(12). P. 2574–2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Ha N. T. N. The involvement of industry professionals and barriers to involvement in work-integrated learning: The case of the profession-oriented higher education framework in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Work. 2022. Vol. 35(1). P. 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2018408
Hanh N. V., Hop N. H. The Effectiveness of the Industrial Field Trip in Introduction to Engineering: A Case Study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018. Vol. 55(3). P. 273–289. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020720918773050
Harris A., Azorín C., Jones M. Network leadership: a new educational imperative. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1919320
Isomöttönen V., Daniels M., Cajander A., Pears, A., McDermott, R. Searching for Global Employability: Can Students Capitalize on Enabling Learning Environments? ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2019. Vol. 19(2). P. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277568
Jameson J., Rumyantseva N., Cai M., Markowski M., Essex R., McNay I. A systematic review, textual narrative synthesis and framework for digital leadership research maturity in Higher Education. Computers and Education Open. 2022. P. 100115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000428
Jensen R., Ottesen E. Unfolding teaching practices in higher education courses: Cases from school leadership programs. International Journal of Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 112. P. 101919. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035521001889
Karns G. L. An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education. 2005. Vol. 27(2). P. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305276641https://journals.sagepub.com/
doi/abs/10.1177/0273475305276641
Kodama C. M., Dugan J. P. Leveraging leadership efficacy for college students: Disaggregating data to examine unique predictors by race. Equity and Excellence in Education. 2013. Vol. 46(2). P. 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.780646
Larastie P., Barnett T., Hansen E. Leading with the heart and/or the head? Experiences of women student leaders in top world forestry universities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2020. Vol. 35(8). P. 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1825787
Maddikunta P. K. R., Pham Q. V., Prabadevi B., Deepa N., Dev K., Gadekallu TR, Liyanage M. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022. Vol. 26. P. 100257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452414X21000558
Magesa M. M., Jonathan J. Conceptualizing digital leadership characteristics for successful digital transformation: the case of Tanzania. Information Technology for Development. 2022. Vol. 28(4). P. 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1991872
McCarthy P., Sammon D., Alhassan I. Digital transformation leadership characteristics: A literature analysis. Journal of Decision Systems. 2022. Vol. 32(1). P. 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1908934
Mukminin A. From east to west: A phenomenological study of Indonesian graduate students’ experiences on the acculturation process at an American public research university. The Florida State University, 2012. https://www.proquest.com/openview/64fb3a67d3a866ad32ecfae7f8445f38/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Nghia T. L. H., My Duyen N. T. Internship-related learning outcomes and their influential factors: The case of Vietnamese tourism and hospitality students. Education+ training. 2018. Vol. 60(1). P. 69–81. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/et-02-2017-0030/full/html
Nupke P. Motivation: Theory and use in Higher Education. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning. 2012. Vol. 8. P. 11–17. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/314/
Owusu-Agyeman Y. Transformational leadership and innovation in higher education: A participative process approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 24(5). P. 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1623919
Pantzos P., Gumaelius L., Buckley J., Pears A. Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023. Vol. 48(1). P. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2093167
Patil R., J. Wagner T., Schweisinger R., Collins A. K., Gramopadhye, Hanna M. A Multi-Disciplinary Mechatronics Course with Assessment- Integrating Theory and Application Through Laboratory Activities. The International Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. Vol. 28(5). P. 1141–1149. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol28-5/16_ijee2632ns.pdf
Philip J., Gavrilova Aguilar M. Student perceptions of leadership skills necessary for digital transformation. Journal of Education for Business. 2022. Vol. 97(2). P. 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1890540
Rowe A., Zegwaard K. Developing Graduate Employability Skills and Attributes: Curriculum Enhancement through Work-integrated Learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2017. Vol. 18(2). P. 87–99. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/d76b1f4d-2284-42e5-9392-81bfa4770611/content
Russell G. M., Kelly N. H. Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203181
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000. Vol. 25(1). P. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Brick by Brick: The Origins, Development, and Future of Self-Determination Theory. In: Advances in Motivation Science. 6. Advances in Motivation Science, edited by AJ Elliot. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Inc, 2019. P. 111–156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221509191930001X
Schell W. J., Kauffmann P. J.. Engineering leadership: Faculty perceptions and profiles. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-faculty-perceptions-and-profiles
Shao Z., Li X., Luo Y., Benitez J. The differential impacts of top management support and transformational supervisory leadership on employees’ digital performance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2022. P. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147456
Siddiqui F.H., Abdekhodaee A., Thaheem M.J. Taxonomy of Digital Skills Needed in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 45th AUBEA Conference, Sydney, Australia. 2022. P. 23–25. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Jamaluddin-Thaheem/publication/365786910_Taxonomy_of_Digital_Skills_Needed_in_
the_Construction_Industry_A_Literature_Review/links/6384529e48124c2bc6
7a4fad/Taxonomy-of-Digital-Skills-Needed-in-the-Construction-Industry-A-Literature-Review.pdf
Susanto P. C., Sawitri N. N. Coaching, Mentoring, Leadership Transformation and Employee Engagement: A Review of the Literature. Dynasty International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2022. Vol. 4(2). P. 297–308. https://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/27969/1/PAPER%20DAB%20BUKTI
%20INDEKS%20%20COACHING_merged.pdf
Thompson S. A., Miller K. L. Disruptive trends in higher education: Leadership skills for successful leaders. Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2018. Vol. 34(2). P. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.008
Trowler V. Leadership practices for student engagement in challenging conditions. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 17(3). P. 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2013.789455
Van Laar E., van Deursen A. J., van Dijk J. A., de Haan J. Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in human behavior. 2019. Vol. 100. P. 93–104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563219302432
Wolter A., Kerst C. The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationship between vocational training and higher education in Germany. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2015. Vol. 10(4). P. 510–524. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1745499915612188
Опубліковано
2025-11-19
Сторінки
36-58
Як цитувати
Роснеллі Р., & Мукмінін А. (2025). Наративне дослідження впливу навчання цифрового лідерства на навчальну мотивацію студентів-інженерів. Інсайт: психологічні виміри суспільства, (14), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2025-14-3
Розділ
ПЕДАГОГІЧНА ТА ВІКОВА ПСИХОЛОГІЯ
Автори, які публікуються у науковому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
· Всі наукові праці можуть вільно копіюватися і поширюватися на будь якому носії і в будь якому форматі, за умови зазначення покликань на вихідні дані наукової праці.
· Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License.
· Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (інституційний репозитатрій, особистий веб-сайт, монографія), здійснивши первинне покликання на публікацію роботи в цьому журналі.
