A Narrative Study of the Impact of Digital Leadership Training on the Learning Motivation of Engineering Students
Keywords:
adaptation, campus effectiveness, computer simulation, flexibility, innovation, collaboration, planning management
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore engineering students’ perspectives on the impact of digital transformation leadership training and its relationship to learning motivation. Methods.
This study employed qualitative methods to explore participants’ experiences, perspectives, and behaviors within the context of the digital leadership training they participated in. Data collection techniques included semi-structured interviews with three civil engineering students, three electrical engineering students, and three mechanical engineering students who participated in the digital leadership training. The results, reviewed from the engineering students’ perspectives, revealed four main themes. These themes included digital simulation as a means of career preparation, active and collaborative participation in training that encourages digital skills enhancement, synergy with the industrial world as a platform for developing work competencies, and training that encourages creativity and innovation to address the challenges of the workplace. Discussion and conclusions. Based on the findings from the engineering students’ perspectives, several conclusions can be drawn. Digital simulation is effective for strengthening career readiness. Active and collaborative participation in training contributes to improving digital skills. Furthermore, the synergy between education and industry is crucial for developing work competencies. Finally, training that emphasizes creativity and innovation is key to adapting to the challenges of today’s dynamic work environment. This conclusion highlights that designing training programs to be contextual, collaborative, and industry-based is essential for effectively enhancing the work readiness of the younger generation. Such an approach ensures that students not only acquire theoretical knowledge but also develop practical competencies and soft skills that are directly applicable to the modern workplace. Suggestions for future research are to analyze the driving and inhibiting factors of student learning motivation based on these four themes to strengthen the design and implementation of training programs, so as to increase the readiness of engineering students to face the dynamics of industrial needs in the era of digital transformation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abbu H., Mugge P., Gudergan G., Hoeborn G., Kwiatkowski A. Measuring the Human Dimensions of Digital Leadership for Successful Digital Transformation: Digital leaders can use the authors’ Digital Leadership Scale to assess their own readiness and ability to accelerate digital transformation. Research-Technology Management. 2022. Vol. 65(3). P. 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2022.2048588
Abdulcalder A. A Synthesized Model of Faculty Motivation in Saudi Arabia’s Higher Education Sector. In: Teaching and Learning in Saudi Arabia: Perspectives from Higher Education, edited by Amani K. Hamdan. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2015. P. 129–143. https://brill.com/display/book/9789463002059/BP000008.xml
Akour M., Alenezi M. Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12(11). P. 784. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Alboaouh K. The Gap Between Engineering Schools and Industry: A Strategic Initiative. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2018. P. 1–6. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Almeida D. J., Byrne A. M., Smith R. M., Ruiz S. How relevant is grit? The importance of social capital in first-generation college students’ academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 23(3). P. 539–559. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1521025119854688
Al-Omari A. A., Tineh AMA, Khasawneh SM. Leadership skills of first-year students at public universities in Jordan. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2008. Vol. 13(3). P. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740802354252
Al-Otaibi S. A, Yusof S. M., Ismail W. K. W. The Influence of Organizational Culture on Students’ Satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial engineering and operations management. 2019. P. 2195–2203. https://ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/688.pdf
Bagga S. K., Gera S., Haque S. N. The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2023. Vol. 28(2). P. 120–131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000355
Balwant P. T. ‘Keeping it real’ authentic instructor- leadership, student engagement and performance, and leader distance. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1657593
Bartolomé J., Garaizar P., Larrucea X. A pragmatic approach for evaluating and accrediting digital competence of digital profiles: a case study of entrepreneurs and remote workers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2022. Vol. 27(3). P. 843–878. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-021-09516-3
Benitez J., Arenas A., Castillo A., Esteves J. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information and Management. 2022. Vol. 59(2). P. 103590. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720622000027
Braun V., V. Clarke. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3(2). P. 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, 2016. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1948986
Buckley J., Adams L., Aribilola I., Arshad I., Azeem M., Bracken L., Zhang L. An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview- based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2022. Vol. 32(4). P. 1963–1982. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-021-09695-1
Butler G. Discipline-specific Versus Generic Academic Literacy Intervention for University Education: An Issue of Impact. Journal for Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 47(2). P. 71–88. https//doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.4
Bygstad B., Øvrelid E., Ludvigsen S., Dæhlen M. From dual digitalization to digital learning spaces: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education. 2022. Vol. 182. P. 104463. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131522000343
Christina H., Sorkos G. Students as informal leaders in deliberate acts of inclusion. Research Papers in Education. 2022. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065525
Clandinin D. J., Huber J. Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 436-441). Elsevier, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
Cohen J., Cook-Sather A., Lesnick A., Alter Z., Awkward R., Decius F., Mengesha L. Students as leaders and learners: Towards self-authorship and social change on a college campus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2013. Vol. 50(1). P. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746511
Dalakas V. Turning Guest Speakers’ Visits into Active Learning Opportunities. Atlantic Marketing Journal. 2016. Vol. 5(2). P. 93–99. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/amj/vol5/iss2/7/
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self- Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11(4). P. 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dev P. C. Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement. Remedial and Special Education. 1997. Vol. 18(1). P. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
Drysdale M. T. B., McBeath M. Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Learning Strategies of University Students Participating in Work-Integrated Learning. Journal of Education and Work. 2018. Vol. 31(5–6). P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1533240
Entwistle N. Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning. In: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck. Boston, MA: Plenum Press, 1988. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2
Goldberg J., Cariapa V., Corliss G., Kaiser K. Benefits of Industry Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2014. Vol. 30. P. 6–13. https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/157/
Gravett K., Kinchin I. M., Winstone N. E. ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 45(12). P. 2574–2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Ha N. T. N. The involvement of industry professionals and barriers to involvement in work-integrated learning: The case of the profession-oriented higher education framework in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Work. 2022. Vol. 35(1). P. 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2018408
Hanh N. V., Hop N. H. The Effectiveness of the Industrial Field Trip in Introduction to Engineering: A Case Study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018. Vol. 55(3). P. 273–289. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020720918773050
Harris A., Azorín C., Jones M. Network leadership: a new educational imperative. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1919320
Isomöttönen V., Daniels M., Cajander A., Pears, A., McDermott, R. Searching for Global Employability: Can Students Capitalize on Enabling Learning Environments? ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2019. Vol. 19(2). P. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277568
Jameson J., Rumyantseva N., Cai M., Markowski M., Essex R., McNay I. A systematic review, textual narrative synthesis and framework for digital leadership research maturity in Higher Education. Computers and Education Open. 2022. P. 100115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000428
Jensen R., Ottesen E. Unfolding teaching practices in higher education courses: Cases from school leadership programs. International Journal of Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 112. P. 101919. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035521001889
Karns G. L. An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education. 2005. Vol. 27(2). P. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305276641https://journals.sagepub.com/
doi/abs/10.1177/0273475305276641
Kodama C. M., Dugan J. P. Leveraging leadership efficacy for college students: Disaggregating data to examine unique predictors by race. Equity and Excellence in Education. 2013. Vol. 46(2). P. 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.780646
Larastie P., Barnett T., Hansen E. Leading with the heart and/or the head? Experiences of women student leaders in top world forestry universities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2020. Vol. 35(8). P. 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1825787
Maddikunta P. K. R., Pham Q. V., Prabadevi B., Deepa N., Dev K., Gadekallu TR, Liyanage M. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022. Vol. 26. P. 100257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452414X21000558
Magesa M. M., Jonathan J. Conceptualizing digital leadership characteristics for successful digital transformation: the case of Tanzania. Information Technology for Development. 2022. Vol. 28(4). P. 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1991872
McCarthy P., Sammon D., Alhassan I. Digital transformation leadership characteristics: A literature analysis. Journal of Decision Systems. 2022. Vol. 32(1). P. 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1908934
Mukminin A. From east to west: A phenomenological study of Indonesian graduate students’ experiences on the acculturation process at an American public research university. The Florida State University, 2012. https://www.proquest.com/openview/64fb3a67d3a866ad32ecfae7f8445f38/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Nghia T. L. H., My Duyen N. T. Internship-related learning outcomes and their influential factors: The case of Vietnamese tourism and hospitality students. Education+ training. 2018. Vol. 60(1). P. 69–81. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/et-02-2017-0030/full/html
Nupke P. Motivation: Theory and use in Higher Education. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning. 2012. Vol. 8. P. 11–17. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/314/
Owusu-Agyeman Y. Transformational leadership and innovation in higher education: A participative process approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 24(5). P. 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1623919
Pantzos P., Gumaelius L., Buckley J., Pears A. Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023. Vol. 48(1). P. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2093167
Patil R., J. Wagner T., Schweisinger R., Collins A. K., Gramopadhye, Hanna M. A Multi-Disciplinary Mechatronics Course with Assessment- Integrating Theory and Application Through Laboratory Activities. The International Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. Vol. 28(5). P. 1141–1149. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol28-5/16_ijee2632ns.pdf
Philip J., Gavrilova Aguilar M. Student perceptions of leadership skills necessary for digital transformation. Journal of Education for Business. 2022. Vol. 97(2). P. 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1890540
Rowe A., Zegwaard K. Developing Graduate Employability Skills and Attributes: Curriculum Enhancement through Work-integrated Learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2017. Vol. 18(2). P. 87–99. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/d76b1f4d-2284-42e5-9392-81bfa4770611/content
Russell G. M., Kelly N. H. Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203181
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000. Vol. 25(1). P. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Brick by Brick: The Origins, Development, and Future of Self-Determination Theory. In: Advances in Motivation Science. 6. Advances in Motivation Science, edited by AJ Elliot. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Inc, 2019. P. 111–156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221509191930001X
Schell W. J., Kauffmann P. J.. Engineering leadership: Faculty perceptions and profiles. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-faculty-perceptions-and-profiles
Shao Z., Li X., Luo Y., Benitez J. The differential impacts of top management support and transformational supervisory leadership on employees’ digital performance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2022. P. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147456
Siddiqui F.H., Abdekhodaee A., Thaheem M.J. Taxonomy of Digital Skills Needed in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 45th AUBEA Conference, Sydney, Australia. 2022. P. 23–25. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Jamaluddin-Thaheem/publication/365786910_Taxonomy_of_Digital_Skills_Needed_in_
the_Construction_Industry_A_Literature_Review/links/6384529e48124c2bc6
7a4fad/Taxonomy-of-Digital-Skills-Needed-in-the-Construction-Industry-A-Literature-Review.pdf
Susanto P. C., Sawitri N. N. Coaching, Mentoring, Leadership Transformation and Employee Engagement: A Review of the Literature. Dynasty International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2022. Vol. 4(2). P. 297–308. https://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/27969/1/PAPER%20DAB%20BUKTI
%20INDEKS%20%20COACHING_merged.pdf
Thompson S. A., Miller K. L. Disruptive trends in higher education: Leadership skills for successful leaders. Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2018. Vol. 34(2). P. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.008
Trowler V. Leadership practices for student engagement in challenging conditions. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 17(3). P. 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2013.789455
Van Laar E., van Deursen A. J., van Dijk J. A., de Haan J. Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in human behavior. 2019. Vol. 100. P. 93–104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563219302432
Wolter A., Kerst C. The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationship between vocational training and higher education in Germany. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2015. Vol. 10(4). P. 510–524. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1745499915612188
Abdulcalder A. A Synthesized Model of Faculty Motivation in Saudi Arabia’s Higher Education Sector. In: Teaching and Learning in Saudi Arabia: Perspectives from Higher Education, edited by Amani K. Hamdan. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2015. P. 129–143. https://brill.com/display/book/9789463002059/BP000008.xml
Akour M., Alenezi M. Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12(11). P. 784. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Alboaouh K. The Gap Between Engineering Schools and Industry: A Strategic Initiative. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2018. P. 1–6. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/784
Almeida D. J., Byrne A. M., Smith R. M., Ruiz S. How relevant is grit? The importance of social capital in first-generation college students’ academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 23(3). P. 539–559. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1521025119854688
Al-Omari A. A., Tineh AMA, Khasawneh SM. Leadership skills of first-year students at public universities in Jordan. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2008. Vol. 13(3). P. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740802354252
Al-Otaibi S. A, Yusof S. M., Ismail W. K. W. The Influence of Organizational Culture on Students’ Satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial engineering and operations management. 2019. P. 2195–2203. https://ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/688.pdf
Bagga S. K., Gera S., Haque S. N. The mediating role of organizational culture: Transformational leadership and change management in virtual teams. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2023. Vol. 28(2). P. 120–131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1029313222000355
Balwant P. T. ‘Keeping it real’ authentic instructor- leadership, student engagement and performance, and leader distance. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1657593
Bartolomé J., Garaizar P., Larrucea X. A pragmatic approach for evaluating and accrediting digital competence of digital profiles: a case study of entrepreneurs and remote workers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2022. Vol. 27(3). P. 843–878. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10758-021-09516-3
Benitez J., Arenas A., Castillo A., Esteves J. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information and Management. 2022. Vol. 59(2). P. 103590. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720622000027
Braun V., V. Clarke. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006. Vol. 3(2). P. 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, 2016. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1948986
Buckley J., Adams L., Aribilola I., Arshad I., Azeem M., Bracken L., Zhang L. An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview- based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2022. Vol. 32(4). P. 1963–1982. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-021-09695-1
Butler G. Discipline-specific Versus Generic Academic Literacy Intervention for University Education: An Issue of Impact. Journal for Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 47(2). P. 71–88. https//doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.4
Bygstad B., Øvrelid E., Ludvigsen S., Dæhlen M. From dual digitalization to digital learning spaces: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education. 2022. Vol. 182. P. 104463. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131522000343
Christina H., Sorkos G. Students as informal leaders in deliberate acts of inclusion. Research Papers in Education. 2022. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065525
Clandinin D. J., Huber J. Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 436-441). Elsevier, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01387-7
Cohen J., Cook-Sather A., Lesnick A., Alter Z., Awkward R., Decius F., Mengesha L. Students as leaders and learners: Towards self-authorship and social change on a college campus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2013. Vol. 50(1). P. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.746511
Dalakas V. Turning Guest Speakers’ Visits into Active Learning Opportunities. Atlantic Marketing Journal. 2016. Vol. 5(2). P. 93–99. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/amj/vol5/iss2/7/
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self- Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11(4). P. 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dev P. C. Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement. Remedial and Special Education. 1997. Vol. 18(1). P. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
Drysdale M. T. B., McBeath M. Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Learning Strategies of University Students Participating in Work-Integrated Learning. Journal of Education and Work. 2018. Vol. 31(5–6). P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1533240
Entwistle N. Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning. In: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck. Boston, MA: Plenum Press, 1988. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2
Goldberg J., Cariapa V., Corliss G., Kaiser K. Benefits of Industry Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2014. Vol. 30. P. 6–13. https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/157/
Gravett K., Kinchin I. M., Winstone N. E. ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 45(12). P. 2574–2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
Ha N. T. N. The involvement of industry professionals and barriers to involvement in work-integrated learning: The case of the profession-oriented higher education framework in Vietnam. Journal of Education and Work. 2022. Vol. 35(1). P. 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2018408
Hanh N. V., Hop N. H. The Effectiveness of the Industrial Field Trip in Introduction to Engineering: A Case Study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018. Vol. 55(3). P. 273–289. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020720918773050
Harris A., Azorín C., Jones M. Network leadership: a new educational imperative. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1919320
Isomöttönen V., Daniels M., Cajander A., Pears, A., McDermott, R. Searching for Global Employability: Can Students Capitalize on Enabling Learning Environments? ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2019. Vol. 19(2). P. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277568
Jameson J., Rumyantseva N., Cai M., Markowski M., Essex R., McNay I. A systematic review, textual narrative synthesis and framework for digital leadership research maturity in Higher Education. Computers and Education Open. 2022. P. 100115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557322000428
Jensen R., Ottesen E. Unfolding teaching practices in higher education courses: Cases from school leadership programs. International Journal of Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 112. P. 101919. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035521001889
Karns G. L. An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education. 2005. Vol. 27(2). P. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305276641https://journals.sagepub.com/
doi/abs/10.1177/0273475305276641
Kodama C. M., Dugan J. P. Leveraging leadership efficacy for college students: Disaggregating data to examine unique predictors by race. Equity and Excellence in Education. 2013. Vol. 46(2). P. 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.780646
Larastie P., Barnett T., Hansen E. Leading with the heart and/or the head? Experiences of women student leaders in top world forestry universities. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2020. Vol. 35(8). P. 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1825787
Maddikunta P. K. R., Pham Q. V., Prabadevi B., Deepa N., Dev K., Gadekallu TR, Liyanage M. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2022. Vol. 26. P. 100257. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452414X21000558
Magesa M. M., Jonathan J. Conceptualizing digital leadership characteristics for successful digital transformation: the case of Tanzania. Information Technology for Development. 2022. Vol. 28(4). P. 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1991872
McCarthy P., Sammon D., Alhassan I. Digital transformation leadership characteristics: A literature analysis. Journal of Decision Systems. 2022. Vol. 32(1). P. 79–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1908934
Mukminin A. From east to west: A phenomenological study of Indonesian graduate students’ experiences on the acculturation process at an American public research university. The Florida State University, 2012. https://www.proquest.com/openview/64fb3a67d3a866ad32ecfae7f8445f38/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Nghia T. L. H., My Duyen N. T. Internship-related learning outcomes and their influential factors: The case of Vietnamese tourism and hospitality students. Education+ training. 2018. Vol. 60(1). P. 69–81. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/et-02-2017-0030/full/html
Nupke P. Motivation: Theory and use in Higher Education. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning. 2012. Vol. 8. P. 11–17. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/314/
Owusu-Agyeman Y. Transformational leadership and innovation in higher education: A participative process approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021. Vol. 24(5). P. 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1623919
Pantzos P., Gumaelius L., Buckley J., Pears A. Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023. Vol. 48(1). P. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2093167
Patil R., J. Wagner T., Schweisinger R., Collins A. K., Gramopadhye, Hanna M. A Multi-Disciplinary Mechatronics Course with Assessment- Integrating Theory and Application Through Laboratory Activities. The International Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. Vol. 28(5). P. 1141–1149. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol28-5/16_ijee2632ns.pdf
Philip J., Gavrilova Aguilar M. Student perceptions of leadership skills necessary for digital transformation. Journal of Education for Business. 2022. Vol. 97(2). P. 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1890540
Rowe A., Zegwaard K. Developing Graduate Employability Skills and Attributes: Curriculum Enhancement through Work-integrated Learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. 2017. Vol. 18(2). P. 87–99. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/d76b1f4d-2284-42e5-9392-81bfa4770611/content
Russell G. M., Kelly N. H. Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203181
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and new Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2000. Vol. 25(1). P. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Brick by Brick: The Origins, Development, and Future of Self-Determination Theory. In: Advances in Motivation Science. 6. Advances in Motivation Science, edited by AJ Elliot. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Inc, 2019. P. 111–156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221509191930001X
Schell W. J., Kauffmann P. J.. Engineering leadership: Faculty perceptions and profiles. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. https://peer.asee.org/engineering-leadership-faculty-perceptions-and-profiles
Shao Z., Li X., Luo Y., Benitez J. The differential impacts of top management support and transformational supervisory leadership on employees’ digital performance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2022. P. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147456
Siddiqui F.H., Abdekhodaee A., Thaheem M.J. Taxonomy of Digital Skills Needed in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 45th AUBEA Conference, Sydney, Australia. 2022. P. 23–25. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Jamaluddin-Thaheem/publication/365786910_Taxonomy_of_Digital_Skills_Needed_in_
the_Construction_Industry_A_Literature_Review/links/6384529e48124c2bc6
7a4fad/Taxonomy-of-Digital-Skills-Needed-in-the-Construction-Industry-A-Literature-Review.pdf
Susanto P. C., Sawitri N. N. Coaching, Mentoring, Leadership Transformation and Employee Engagement: A Review of the Literature. Dynasty International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2022. Vol. 4(2). P. 297–308. https://repository.ubharajaya.ac.id/27969/1/PAPER%20DAB%20BUKTI
%20INDEKS%20%20COACHING_merged.pdf
Thompson S. A., Miller K. L. Disruptive trends in higher education: Leadership skills for successful leaders. Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2018. Vol. 34(2). P. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.008
Trowler V. Leadership practices for student engagement in challenging conditions. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 17(3). P. 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2013.789455
Van Laar E., van Deursen A. J., van Dijk J. A., de Haan J. Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in human behavior. 2019. Vol. 100. P. 93–104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563219302432
Wolter A., Kerst C. The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationship between vocational training and higher education in Germany. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2015. Vol. 10(4). P. 510–524. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1745499915612188
Published
2025-11-19
Pages
36-58
How to Cite
Rosnelli R., & Mukminin A. (2025). A Narrative Study of the Impact of Digital Leadership Training on the Learning Motivation of Engineering Students. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (14), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2025-14-3
Section
EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Authors who publish with scientific journal agree to the following terms:
• All scientific papers may be freely copied and distributed on any medium and in any format, provided that the references to the initial data of the scientific work are indicated.
• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Creative Commons Attribution License .
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non- exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (institutional repository, your website, monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
