Subjective well-being and anxiety level during the COVID-2019 crisis: study in Ukrainian adolescence

Keywords: subjective well-being, anxiety, pandemic, COVID-19, quarantine, adolescence

Abstract

The global pandemia and introduced quarantine providescompletely new social conditions that affectthe mental health of people. The influence of traitand state anxiety on people with different levels of subjectivewell-being in quarantine remains unexplored. Method: We used the PERMA-Profiler (J. Butler, M.Kern) technique to diagnose the overall level of subjectivewell-being and its components. The STAI method(С. Spielberger) was also used to study the levelof respondent’s trait and state anxiety. Results: It wasfound that the overall level of life satisfaction is significantlynegatively correlated with the level of traitanxiety (r = - .25). The level of state anxiety was unexpectedlylower at the beginning of quarantine (43.95 ±3.90), than one month later (48.50 ± 5.08). Qualitativeanalysis has led to the conclusion that in adolescencethis is due to a lack of awareness of the dangersof a pandemic and the general attitude to quarantineas a holiday and vacation. There was an inverse relationshipbetween anxiety and positive emotions beforethe quarantine, but under quarantine, positive emotionslost their potential to contain anxiety, and correlationswere insignificant, so even positive eventsunder quarantine could not reduce COVID-19 anxiety.However, the general level of subjective well-beingof Ukrainian youth does not correlate with the levelof anxiety and has not changed significantly duringthe first months of the quarantine. Conclusions: Theconcept of subjective well-being of Ukrainian youthis based primarily on subjective indicators of positiveemotions and meanings and much less depends onmore objective criteria, such as health, engagementand accomplishment. It was found that during the firstmonth of the quarantine, the level of state anxiety didnot affect the experience of subjective well-being byUkrainian adolescence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of positive psychological constructs and emotions on stress, anxiety, and well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18, 216–228. DOI: 10.1177/1548051810397368

Bradburn, N. (2016). The structure of psychological will-being. Chicago: Aldine.

Bromley, E., Johnson, J. G., & Cohen, P. (2006). Personality strengths in adolescence and decreased risk of developing mental health problems in early adulthood. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 315–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.11.003

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (p. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L. et al. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The LANCET: Rapid Review, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

Butler, J., & Kern, M. L., (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

Fardin, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and Anxiety: A Review of Psychological Impacts of Infectious Disease Outbreaks. Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases. In Press/ DOI: 10.5812/archcid.102779

Hawryluck L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea, S., & Styra, R. (2004). SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(7), 1206–1212. DOI: 10.3201/eid1007.030703

Ma, F., Shevchenko, R. P., & Karhina, N. V. (2020). Uiavlennia studentskoi molodi pro psykholohichne blahopoluchchia: rezultaty kontent-analizu tvoriv [Student youth representation of psychological well-being: results of content analysis of works] Insait: psykholohichni vymiry suspilstva: naukovyi zhurnal – Insight: the psychological dimensions of society, 3, 44-55. DOI: 10.32999/2663-970X/2020-3-3

Maslow, A. H. (1999). Towards a Psychology of Being. Third edition. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Rubin, G. J., Wessely, S. (2020). The psychological effects of quarantining a city. British Medical Journal, 313–368. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m313.

Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L., (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

Sanko, K. (2016). Psykholohichne blahopoluchchia yak osnova povnotsinnoho ta psykholohichno zdorovoho funktsionuvannia osobystosti [Psychological well-being as the basis of full and psychologically healthy functioning of the personality] Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia “Psykholohiia”-189.

Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., Patton, G. C. (2018) The age of adolescence. The LANCET Child and adolescent health, 2(3), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1

Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.

Serduk, L. Z. (2017). Struktura ta funktsiia psikholohichnoho blahopoluchia osobistosti [The structure and function of psychological well-being of the individual]. Aktualni problem psikholohii: Zbirnik naukovikh prats Institutu psikholohii imeni H. S. Kostuka NAPN Ukraini – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of scientific works of the G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the NAPS of Ukraine. Psychophysiology. Psychology of labor. Experimental psychology, 5(17), 124–133. [in Ukrainian].

Shamionov, R. M. (2004). Psihologiya sub’ektivnogo blagopoluchiya lichnost. [Psychology of personality’s subjective well-being]. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta – Saratov University Publishing House. [in Russian].

Sheridan, Z., Boman, P., Mergler, A., & Furlong, M. J., (2015). Examining well-being, anxiety, and self-deception in university students. Cogent Psychology, 2(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2014.993850

Spielberger, C. D., Lushene, R. E., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press.

State, T. M., & Kern, L. (2017). Life Satisfaction Among High School Students with Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(4), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717714573

Titarenko, T. M. (2017). Shchastia, zdorovia, blahopoluchia: dosiahnennia nedosiazhnoho [Happiness, health, well-being: achievement inaccessible].

Rakursi psihologIchnogo blagopoluchchya osobistostI. Tezi dopovIdey na VseukraYinskomu naukovo-praktichnomu semInarI. – Perspectives of psychological well-being of a person: a collection of abstracts of reports of All-Ukrainian scientific-practical seminar, 1, 5–12. [in Ukrainian].

Vygotsky, L.S. (2005). Psichologia razvitija cheloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow: SMYSL. [in Russian].

Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., et al. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 17–29. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051729.

Zasiekina, L. V., & Majstruk, V. M., (2017). Bezumovne samopryiniattia ta psykholohichne blahopoluchchia osobystosti [Unconditional self-acceptance and psychological well-being of the individual]. Nauka i osvita – Science and Education, 11, 187–192. [in Ukrainian].
Published
2021-12-10
Pages
28-39
How to Cite
Orap, M. O., Akimova, N. V., & Kalba, Y. Y. (2021). Subjective well-being and anxiety level during the COVID-2019 crisis: study in Ukrainian adolescence. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (6), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2021-6-3
Section
GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY