The Incorporation of Employee Performance Appraisal into Organizational Development Strategies

Keywords: labor involvement, motivation, adaptation, work result, pharmaceutical industry, marketplace

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of scientifically based methods for assessing employee performance in modern organizations, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. The research aims to integrate the evaluation process into the organization’s development strategy, ensuring alignment with both internal and external environmental factors. Furthermore, it focuses on examining the utility of jobEQ tests for measuring work attitudes, motivation, and emotional intelligence. Methods.
The study employs a comprehensive review of existing literature on employee involvement and performance assessment, with a focus on identifying gaps in current methodologies. It also includes an analysis of jobEQ tools, specifically the Inventory for Work Attitude & Motivation (iWAM), COMET, and the Values Systems Questionnaire (VSQ), to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting employee behavior and performance in various job contexts. Results. The findings reveal that while various methods for assessing employee involvement exist, they often fail to account for the unique external and internal environments of organizational structures. The jobEQ tests, particularly iWAM and COMET/EQ, provide valuable insights into employee thinking styles, motivational preferences, and emotional intelligence, which are critical for aligning individual performance with organizational goals. Conclusions. To summarize, the integration of evidence-based employee performance evaluation methods with an organization's development strategy is crucial for achieving strategic goals and enhancing overall effectiveness. The jobEQ tests offer a promising approach to measuring key aspects of employee engagement, but further research is needed to develop assessment tools that fully consider the complexities of both the external and internal organizational environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera R. V., De Massis A., Fini R., Vismara S. Organizational Goals, Outcomes, and the Assessment of Performance: Reconceptualizing Success in Management studies. Journal of Management Studies. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12994
Ali M., Lei S., Wei X.-Y. (2018). The mediating role of the employee relations climate in the relationship between strategic HRM and organizational performance in Chinese banks. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2018. Vol. 3(3). P. 115–122. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.003
Basu A., Mermillod M. Emotional Intelligence and Social-Emotional Learning: An overview. Online Submission. 2011. Vol. 1(3). P. 182–185. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535684
Chaudhuri R., Chatterjee S., Mariani M. M., Wamba S. F. Assessing the influence of emerging technologies on organizational data driven culture and innovation capabilities: A sustainability performance perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024. Vol. 200. № 123165. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123165
Chicco D., Jurman G. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification. BioData Mining. 2023. Vol. 16(1). URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00322-4
Do H., Budhwar P., Shipton H., Nguyen H. D., Nguyen B. Building organizational resilience and innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research. 2022. Vol. 141. P. 808–821.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014829632100905X
Fombrun C. J., Gardberg N. A., Sever J. M. The Reputation Quotient SM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of brand management. 2000. Vol. 7. P. 241–255. URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10
Grover S, Furnham A. Coaching as a Developmental Intervention in Organisations: A Systematic Review of Its Effectiveness and the Mechanisms Underlying It. PLoS ONE. 2016. Vol. 11(7). No. e0159137. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159137
Halwani A. A. Development of Pharmaceutical Nanomedicines: From the Bench to the Market. Pharmaceutics. 2022. Vol. 14(1). № 106. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010106
Larson M. D., Latham J. R., Appleby C. A., Harshman C. L. CEO Attitudes and Motivations: Are They Different for High-performing Organizations? Quality Management Journal. 2017. Vol. 19 (4). P. 55–69.
URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/f/10.1080/10686967.2012.11918083?needAccess=true
Merlevede P. Motivation in the Workplace: What meta-programs can tell us about performance and retention? In 3rd International NLP Research conference, July. 2012. P. 6–7. URL: https://www.jobeq.com/articles/ResearchConf2012.pdf
Merlevede P. Talent management: A focus on Excellence. Managing Human Resources in a Knowledge Economy. Bookboon, London, 2014. URL: https://www.academia.edu/download/50523206/talent-management-a-focus-on-excellence.pdf
Powell M. Work motivations as predictors of academic and clinical performance and satisfaction with career choice in medical students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle, Australia. 2009. URL: https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:5841
Radha P., Aithal P. S. ABCD Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives on the Conceptual Model: Unveiling Synergies between Digital Transformation and Organizational Performance in Manufacturing. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML). 2024. Vol. 8(1). P. 15–38. URL: https://www.supublication.com/index.php/ijcsbe/article/view/1141
Reinhardt I. C., Oliveira J. C., Ring D. T. Current Perspectives on the Development of Industry 4.0 in the Pharmaceutical Sector. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2020. Vol. 18. No. 100131. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100131
Rosyafah S., Pudjowati J. What are the Key Determinants of Human Resource Management Effectiveness in Enhancing Organizational Financial Performance? Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi. 2024. Vol. 7(1). P. 525–560. URL: https://jurnal.feb-umi.id/index.php/ATESTASI/article/view/815
Sánchez-Ortiz J., Rodríguez-Cornejo V., Del Río- Sánchez R., García-Valderrama T. Indicators to Measure Efficiency in Circular Economies. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12(11). No. 4483. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114483
Sarangi S., Vats A. Role of Emotional Intelligence on Employee Engagement: A Study among Indian Professionals. International Journal of Business and Management. 2015. Vol. 10(6). URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n6p224
Sekreter G. Emotional Intelligence as a vital indicator of Teacher Effectiveness. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies. 2019. Vol. 5(3). P. 286–302. URL: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p286
Situngkir H. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Enhancing Company Value: Evidence from Sustainable Companies. Journal of Energy and Environmental Policy Options. 2024. Vol. 7(2). P. 17–27. URL: https://resdojournals.com/index.php/JEEPO/article/view/359
Tasoulis K., Pappas I. O., Vlachos P., Oruh E. S. Employee reactions to planned organizational culture change: A configurational perspective. Human Relations. 2023. Vol. 77(9). P. 1272–1305. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231183305
Tenschert J., Furtner M., Peters M. The effects of self-leadership and mindfulness training on leadership development: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly. 2024. P. 1–52. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00448-7
Truss C., Shantz A., Soane E., Alfes K., Delbridge, R. Employee engagement, organizational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2013. Vol. 24(14). P. 2657–2669. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.798921
Vasilieva E. V. Development of Leadership Institute and Personnel Landscape in conditions of Digital Transformation. In 1st International Conference of Information Systems and Design. 2020. Vol. 158125. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2570/paper6.pdf
Published
2025-05-29
Pages
568-599
How to Cite
Abdykalikova M., & Aikinbayeva G. (2025). The Incorporation of Employee Performance Appraisal into Organizational Development Strategies. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (13), 568-599. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2026-13-23