Readiness for Risk among Higher Education Students in the Context of Social Changes
Abstract
The aim is a theoretical-empirical study of the phenomenon of readiness for risk among higher education students in the context of relevant social changes. Methods. The sample consisted of students from three levels of higher education: Bachelor’s, Master’s, and prospective Ph.D. candidates, who were studying at universities in Ukraine, totaling 114 individuals (M = 21.04; SD = ±3.75). The social changes affecting students and their higher education institutions validly reproduced the key conditions of the research.
The methodologies used met the main criteria: validity, reliability, and representativeness, and were adapted and/or tested on a Ukrainian sample. The parameters studied were assessed using the following psychodiagnostic instruments: “Diagnosis of Readiness for Risk” (RSK) (Schubert, 1964), “Test-Questionnaire of Qualitative Components of Risk Tendency” (TRT) (Sannikova & Bykova, 2008), and “Personal Readiness for Change Questionnaire” (PRCQ) (Rollnick et al., 1992). Results. A confirmatory research strategy was employed to compare the studied variables. A matrix of psychological correlates was constructed. It was established that the predominance of direct relationships provides grounds to assert that with an increase in readiness for risk, there is also an increase in readiness for personal changes, and correspondingly, with an increase in readiness for personal changes, the willingness to take risks also increases. It was clarified and justified that nine inverse relationships between risk parameters and creativity, adaptability, and tolerance for ambiguity indicate an inverse pattern. It was explained that these internalized properties of creativity, optimism, adaptability, and tolerance for ambiguity in respondents with low readiness to take risks are reflected in coping behavior strategies and can be realized through the operation of defense mechanisms. Discussion and Conclusions. It was substantiated that the readiness for risk among respondents in the context of social changes is a stable, multifaceted, and hierarchical property of personality, which can determine behavior strategies under uncertainty, based on analyzing the current situation and personal capabilities. It was explained that the recorded significant differences indicate personality traits that have become pronounced in current situations of social change. It was noted that these traits are important contours of the psychological profile of the higher education seeker in the context of relevant situations of social change. The obtained correlations and significant differences represent scientific value within the context of the research subject.
Downloads
References
Блискун О. Реінтеграція молоді у соціум: соціально-психологічний аспект. Психологія особистості. 2021. Т. 11. № 1. С. 5–11. https://doi.org/10.15330/ps.11.1.5-11
Бикова С. В. Індивідуально-типологічні особливості схильності до ризику: дис. ... канд. психол. наук. Південноукр. держ. пед. ун-т імені К. Д. Ушинського. Одеса, 2008. 204 с. URL: http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/272
Halian I., Popovych I., Vovk V., Kariyev A., Poleshchuk L., Halian O. Correlation of the coach’s qualities and junior athletes’ self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023. Vol. 23(7). P 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.07199
Hatfield J., Fernandes R. The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. Accident; analysis and prevention. 2009. Vol. 41(1). P. 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.023
Гоян І. М. Соціально-психологічні основи самоорганізації молоді в умовах суспільних змін. Київ: ПВТП “LAT&K”, 2021. 320 с. URL: https://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?Z21ID=&I21DBN=EC&P21DBN=EC&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullw&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=I=&S21COLORTERMS=0&S21STR=%D0%92%D0%90854513
Hoian І. М. Axiological aspects of youth moral and legal decision-making. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2019. Vol. 16. P. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187572
Hudimova A., Popovych I., Savchuk O., Liashko V., Pyslar A., Hrys A. Research on the relationship between excessive use of social media and young athletes’ physical activity. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2021. Vol. 21(6). P. 3364–3373. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.06456
Josef A. K., Richter D., Samanez-Larkin G. R., Wagner G. G., Hertwig R., Mata R. Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2016. Vol. 111(3). P. 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000090
Ільчук С. Соціальне виключення: виклик сьогодення чи вічна проблема соціального буття? Вища освіта України. 2024. №2. С. 28–36. https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4034-4539
Кокун О. М., Мороз В. М., Пішко І. О., Лозінська Н. С. Формування психологічної готовності військовослужбовців військової служби за контрактом до виконання завдань за призначенням під час бойового злагодження. Київ: 7БЦ, 2021. 170 с. URL: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/726799/1/Посіб_СТАРТ_ISBN.pdf
Курова А. В. Ситуація невизначеності у парадигмі сучасних викликів суспільства. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Психологія. 2022. №4. С. 51–55. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2021.4.10
Kremen V. Education in Ukraine defies the war. European Journal of Education. 2023. Vol. 58. P. 538–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12597
Kremen V. G. From dialectic to man. Voprosy Filosofii. 2014. Vol. 1. P. 92–103. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298440815_From_Dialectics_to_Human
Mavletova A., Witte J. Is the willingness to take risks contagious? A comparison of immigrants and native-born in the United States. Journal of Risk Research. 2016. Vol. 20(7). P. 827–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1119180
Mata R., Josef A. K., Hertwig R. Propensity for Risk Taking Across the Life Span and Around the Globe Psychological Science. 2016. Vol. 27(2). P. 231–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615617811
Mitroshkina, O. (2018). Specificity of psychological readiness for changes and personal competence in the employees of the state criminal-executive service of Ukraine. Psychological Journal, 4(9), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2018.9.19.4
Орлов О. В. Обґрунтування можливості використання психофармакотерапевтичних методів для подолання негативного впливу російської війни на психічне здоров’я населення. Інсайт: психологічні виміри суспільства. 2022. №7. С. 103–117. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-7-8
Peralta C., Silva M. V., Dores A. R., Silva M. A., Pinto M. V., Ramos D., Rodrigues M. A. Preventive Behaviors Among Higher Education Students in Response to COVID-19: The Role of Risk Perception. Safety. 2024. Vol. 10(4). P. 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10040094
Person A. I., Frazier P. A. Coping strategy-situation fit vs. present control: relations with perceived stress in U.S. college students. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2024. Vol. 37(2). P. 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2217099
Popovych I., Borysiuk A., Semenov O., Semenova N., Serbin I., Reznikova O. Comparative analysis of the mental state of athletes for risk-taking in team sports. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022a. Vol. 22(4). P. 848–857. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.04107
Popovych I., Kurova A., Koval I., Kazibekova V., Maksymov M., Huzar V. Interdependence of emotionality, anxiety, aggressiveness and subjective control in handball referees before the beginning of a game: a comparative analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022b. Vol. 22(3). P. 680–689. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.03085
Popovych I., Plokhikh V., Hrys A., Pavliuk M., Nosov P., Zinchenko S. Operationalization of footballers’ emotional intelligence in the dimensions of motivational orientation: analysis based on the basic positions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023. Vol. 23(3). P. 772–781. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.03095
Popovych I., Shcherbak T., Kuzikova S., Blynova O., Nosov P., Zinchenko S. Operationalization of tactical thinking of football players by main game roles. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2021. Vol. 21(5). P. 2480–2491. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.05334
Radul V., Stryzhakov A., Hornar I., Radul O., Tkachenko O. Research of future masters of pedagogy’s socio-professional activity. Amazonia Investiga. 2022. Vol. 11(56). P. 18–27. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.56.08.2
Raitasalo K., Järvinen-Tassopoulos J., Rask S., Skogberg N. Risk and Protective Factors for Gambling Among Youth by origin: Findings from the three waves of cross-sectional Finnish School Health Promotion Study among 238,939 Students. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2024. Vol. 40. P. 1905–1919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10321-7
Rollnick S., Heather N., Gold R., Hall W. Readiness to Change Questionnaire [Database record]. APA PsycTests. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00434-000
Саннікова О. П., Бикова С. В. Психологічна діагностика стійкої схильності до ризику: апробація оригінальної методики. Проблеми гуманітарних наук. Наукові записки Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені І. Франка. Психологія. 2008. № 19. С. 4–15. URL: https://scholar.google.com.ua/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=7741018545839989744
Саннікова О., Санніков О. Авантюрність і ризик у структурі прийняття рішень. Наука і освіта. 2018. №9–10. С. 111–119. URL: https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/articles/2018-9-10-doc/2018-9-10-st16
Schubert G. Diagnostics of Risk Readiness (RSK). 1964. URL: https://studfile.net/preview/5287941/page:4/
Sando O. J., Kleppe R., Sandseter E. B. H. Risk willingness in play: exploring children’s behaviour in a virtual reality playground. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2024. Vol. 33(2). P. 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2024.2437769
Sonsino D., Shifrin M., Lahav E. Gender differences in the stability of trust and risk-taking. Journal of Trust Research. 2023. Vol. 13(2). P. 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2199023
Srivastava, R. (2023). Gender differences in frustration and ambiguity tolerance during Covid-19 pandemic in India. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144023-05507-y
Tavrovetska N., Popovych I., Savchuk O., Piletskа L., Lappo V., Abramian N., Zahrai L. Research on risk inclination of young female athletes in the dimensions of life orientations. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023. Vol. 23(4). P. 868–877. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.04110
Traczyk J., Zaleskiewicz T. Implicit attitudes toward risk: the construction and validation of the measurement method. Journal of Risk Research. 2015. Vol. 19(5). P. 632–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.1003957
Wang Y., Liu W., Liang Y., Li Y., Fan X., Jiang X., Su Y. Left-behind cumulative risk and academic adjustment in Chinese middle school students: The moderating effect of growth mindset. International Journal of Psychology. 2024. Vol. 59. P. 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13223
Woller S. J., Boffa J. W., Viana A. G., Albanese B. J., Vujanovic A. A. PTSD symptoms, suicidal ideation, and suicidal risk among university students: The role of shame. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2025. Vol. 17(1). P. 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001829
Xiang J., Peng F., Jiao J., Tan T., Liu L., Chen M., Wang J., Luo D., Liu S. Health risk behaviors, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among college students: A latent class analysis in middle China. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2025. Vol. 375. P. 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.107
Zafari Z., Goldman L., Kovrizhkin K., Muennig P. Willingness-to-pay tuition and risk-taking proclivities among public health students. Journal of American College Health. 2021. Vol. 71(9). P. 2705–2710. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1987249
Zhu W., Huang L., Zhou X., Li X., Shi G., Ying J., Wang C. Could AI Ethical Anxiety, Perceived Ethical Risks and Ethical Awareness About AI Influence University Students’ Use of Generative AI Products? An Ethical Perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2024. Vol. 41(1). P. 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with scientific journal agree to the following terms:
• All scientific papers may be freely copied and distributed on any medium and in any format, provided that the references to the initial data of the scientific work are indicated.
• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Creative Commons Attribution License .
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non- exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (institutional repository, your website, monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
