PERSONAL DETERMINANTS OF RESPONSI BILITY OF FUTURE EDUCATORS
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the publication is to analyze the factors that contribute to the development of personal responsibility.
Methods. The study has used diagnostic techniques that measure the level of responsibility (O. Krupnov’s “Responsibility” questionnaire) and personal traits (16-PF Kettell test). Responsibility has been defined as factor G, which is revealed through obligatoriness, discipline, honesty, accuracy, neatness, diligence and others. Indicators of the “Responsibility” questionnaire scales contributed to the functional analysis of responsibility according to such components as: dynamic, emotional, regulatory, regulatory-dynamic (operational), motivational, cognitive one. The complex liability parameter was determined by the sum of the liability indices of the four components mentioned above. Factor analysis contributed to the separation of responsibility structure of the subjects.
Results. It is established that future teachers with an optimal level of responsibility will have a clearer understanding of the responsibility and a meaningful desire for its realization. They are characterized by harmonious personal characteristics, which are manifested in the variability of goals and intentions to the expression of responsibility, expressed motivation, social activity, internal regulation, optimism and high efficiency. Future teachers with a suboptimal level of responsibility have found a lack of awareness of responsibility, its external self-regulation, low rank positions of harmonious personal characteristics, lack of purposefulness and motivation, as well as social passivity.
Conclusions. Therefore, a comprehensive study of responsibility is possible in case of providing the use of a systematic approach that helps to reveal its integral quality in the organization of human life. Responsibility is most closely linked to some personal factors (according to R. Kettell) that are realized through learning, developing independence, confidence, personal well-being.
In our opinion, it is promising to study the relationship of personal responsibility with individual typological personal traits.
Downloads
References
2. Dementiy, L.I. (2006). Otvetstvennost lichnosti kak svoystvo sub'ekta zhiznedeyatelnosti [The responsibility of the individual as a peculiarity of the subject of life]. Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
3. Maylenova, F. (2002). Vybor i otvetstvennost v psikhologicheskom konsultirovanii [Choice and responsibility in psychological consultancy.]. Moscow: KSP+ [in Russian]
4. Maslou, A. (2002). Po napravleniyu k psikhologii bytiya [Toward a psychology of being]. Moscow: Nauka. EKSMO-Press [in Russian]
5. Mey, R. (1994). Iskusstvo psikhologicheskogo konsultirovaniya [The art of psychological consultancy]. Moscow: Nezavisimaya firma «Klass» [in Russian]
6. Nelson-Dzhouns, R. (2001). Teoriya i praktika konsultirovaniya [The theory and practice of consultancy]. Saint Petersburg [in Russian]
7. Perlz, F. (2001). Geshtalt-podkhod. Svidetel terapii [Gestalt approach. Witness of therapy]. (M. Papusha, Trans). Moscow : Izd-vo in-ta psikhoterapii [in Russian]
8. Pryadein, V.P. (1998). Polovozrastnyye osobennosti otvetstvennosti lichnosti [Age-specific features of personal responsibility]. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t [in Russian]
9. Pryadein, V.P. (2013). Psihodiagnostika lichnosti : izbrannyie psihologicheskie metodiki yi testyi [Personal Psychodiagnostics: selected psychological methods and tests]. Surgut: RIO SutGPU [in Russian]
10. Rodzhers, K.R. (1999). Konsultirovanie i psihoterapiya. Noveyshie podhodyi v oblasti prakticheskoy rabotyi [Consultancy and psychotherapy. The latest approaches in the field of practical work]. Moscow: EKSMO-Press [in Russian]
11. Feldshteyn, D.I. (1994). Psihologiya stanovleniya lichnosti [Psychology of personality development]. Moscow : Vyisshaya shkola [in Russian]
12. Frankl, V. (2016). Liudyna v poshukakh spravzhnoho sensu. Psykholoh u kontstabori [A person in search of true meaning. Psychologist in a concentration camp]. (O. Zamoiska, Trans). Kharkiv: Knyzhkovyi Klub «Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia» [in Ukraine].
13. Shevchenko, N. I. (1997). Problemy svobody i sotsialnoy otvetstvennosti v khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [Problems of freedom and social responsibility in artistic creativity]. Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian]
14. Yalom, I. (2015). Ekzistentsialnaya psikhoterapiya [Existential psychotherapy]. Moscow: Klass [in Russian]
15. Yalom I. (2015). Vglyadyivayas v solntse. Zhizn bez straha smerti [Looking out into the sun. Life without fear of death]. Moscow: Eskimo [in Russian]
16. Rotter, J. (1954). The development and application of social learning theory: selected papers. ... Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Vol. 17. Р. 206–213.
Authors who publish with scientific journal agree to the following terms:
• All scientific papers may be freely copied and distributed on any medium and in any format, provided that the references to the initial data of the scientific work are indicated.
• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Creative Commons Attribution License .
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non- exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (institutional repository, your website, monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
