Research on Academic Giftedness of Future Teachers

Keywords: phenomenon of giftedness, academic performance, students, educational environment, educational- professional activity, higher education institution.

Abstract

The aim of the research is to establish psychological content parameters, correlations and factors of future teachers’ academic giftedness. It was assumed that personal factors of future teachers’ academic giftedness would have statistically significant correlations with academic performance and parameters of intelligence; the researched groups distributed by academic performance evaluation would have significant differences by personal factors of academic giftedness, verbal, mathematical and spatial intelligence. Methods. The research participants were the 2nd–4th year full-time students pursuing a degree in pedagogy at three higher education institutions: two institutions from Kazakhstan – Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University (Abai KNPU), Auezov South Kazakhstan University (Auezov SKU) and one institution from Bulgaria – “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse (RU “Angel Kanchev”), numbering 258 people aged from 18 to 22 years. The method for diagnosing personal factors of giftedness (PFG) (Belskaya, 2019); “Intelligence structure test” (IST 2000) (Amtchauer et al., 2001) were applied. An additional variable – academic performance evaluation (APE) – was used. Results. Pearson’s correlation analysis (R) allowed establishing fifteen correlations (р ≤ .050; р ≤ .010; p < .001) between the factors of academic giftedness, the types of intelligence and academic performance evaluation. It was found that the factor of giftedness “over-situational activeness” has the largest number of significant correlations – four (p < .001; р ≤ .050). It was substantiated that this factor is the most important and the most dependent one in future teachers’ academic giftedness. The Mann-Whitney U-test allowed establishing a statistically significant advantage of Group 2 (a high level of academic performance evaluation) by the parameter “over-situational activeness” (U = 6340.000; p < .040). It was explained that the respondents’ over-situational activeness is a backbone factor of future teachers’ academic giftedness. Discussion and conclusions. The obtained empirical results and the established statistically significant correlations and differences possess scientific novelty and applied value. A number of recommendations concerning reorganization and implementation of innovative processes of training future teachers aimed at developing academic giftedness and providing quality psychological-pedagogical support for gifted students were made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amthauer R., Brocke B., Liepmann D., Beauducel A. Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000. R. Göttingen: Hogrefe. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1026//1617- 6391.1.1.50
Anand K., Lall M. Education Policy and Politics in India and in Delhi. Delhi’s Education Revolution: Teachers, Agency and Inclusion: UCL Press. 2022. P. 24–55. URL: https://www.uclpress.co.uk/products/ 180556
Бельская Н. А. Методика диагностики личностных факторов одаренности (ЛФО). Освіта та розвиток обдарованої особистості. 2019. № 3(74)/ІІІ квартал. С. 30–38. https://doi. org/10.32405/2309-3935-2019-3(74)-30-38
Blynova O., Popovych I., Hulias I., Radul S., Borozentseva T., Strilets-Babenko O., Minenko O. Psychological safety of the educational space in the structure of motivational orientation of female athletes: a comparative analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022. Vol. 22(11). P. 2723–2732. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11346
Borland J. H. The Construct of Giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education. 2021. Vol. 72(3/4). P. 6–20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ584822
Chang H.-T., Lin C.-Y., Wang L.-W., Tseng F.-C. How Students Can Effectively Choose the Right Courses: Building a Recommendation System to Assist Students in Choosing Courses Adaptively. Educational Technology & Society. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 61–74. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1335937
Das R. Un‘casting’ Universities: Examining the Intersections of Inclusive Curriculum and Dalit Pedagogies in a Private University in Bangalore, India. CASTE A Global Journal on Social Exclusion. 2023. Vol. 4(1). P. 154–166. https://doi.org/10.26812/caste.v4i1.428
Ford D. Y. Desegregating Gifted Education: A Need Unmet. The Journal of Negro Education. 1995. Vol. 64(1). P. 52–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967284
Halian I., Popovych I., Hulias I., Serbin Iy., Vyshnevska O., Kovalchuk Z., Pyslar A. Correlation between personality traits of young athletes and their level of self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023a. Vol. 23(5). P. 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.05140
Halian I., Popovych I., Vovk V., Kariyev A., Poleshchuk L., Halian O. Correlation of the coach’s qualities and junior athletes’ self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023b. Vol. 23(7). P 1621– 1630. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.07199
Hilmy M. A. The Impact of Sending Top College Graduates to Rural Primary Schools. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies. 2023. Vol. 39. Vol. S62–S79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27211216
Kaiser M., Seitz S. Giftedness and Achievement within Discourses: International Perspectives on Inclusive Education: In the Light of Educational Justice. 2023. P. 67–88. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:26652
Kalka N. M., Fedyshyn O. M., Horyn H. R. Empirical research of features of emotional competence of university teachers in the conditions of distance learning. Social and Legal Studios. 2022. Vol. 5(1). P. 57–62. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162- 2022-5-57-62
Kariyev A., Sultanova Z., Yeraliyeva T., Fadeyeva O., Nazymgul, Assenova N., Nurgalym K. Interactive educational technologies as a factor in the development of the subjectivity of university students. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 2022. Vol. 14(3). P. 533–543. https://doi. org/10.18844/wjet.v14i3.7269
Kershen J. E. L. Teaching, Giftedness, and Differentiation: A Reflection. The English Journal. 2015. Vol. 105(1). P. 69–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 24484488
Kulz C., Morrin K., McGinity R. (eds), Inside the English Education Lab: Critical Qualitative and Ethnographic Perspectives on the Academies Experiment (Manchester, 2022; online edn, Manchester Scholarship Online, 18 May 2023), https://doi. org/10.7765/9781526145390
Kushnirovich N. The Theory of Ethnic Economics and Ethnic Economy. Immigration and Integration in Israel and Beyond: Verlag. 2023. P. 53–78. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839466759-004
Lauwers G. Reshaping Teacher Training to Get the Right Education System for a Knowledge Society. Rethinking Teacher Education for the 21st Century: Trends, Challenges and New Directions: Verlag Barbara Budrich. 2019. P. 43–53. https://doi. org/10.3224/84742241
Lin C.-H., Wu W.-H., Lee T.-N. Using an Online Learning Platform to Show Students’ Achievements and Attention in the Video Lecture and Online Practice Learning Environments. Educational Technology & Society. 2022. Vol. 25(1). P. 155–165. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647037
Linnenbrink-Garcia L., Walton S. P. Last Word: Unmotivated Students? Maybe It’s Us. ASEE Prism. 2023. Vol. 32(3). P. 28. URL: https://www.siue.edu/engineering/ asee-conference/2023ASEEILINProceedings.pdf
McCreary M. L. Clinical creativity. Trauma and Race – A Path to Wellbeing: 1517 Media, 2023. P. 117–34. URL: https://micahmccreary.com/
Nosov P. S., Popovych I. S., Cherniavskyi V. V., Zinchenko S. M., Prokopchuk Y. A., Makarchuk D. V. Automated identification of an operator anticipation on marine transport. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control. 2020. Vol. 3(1). 158–172. https:// doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-3-15
Peterson J. S. Addressing Counseling Needs of Gifted Students. Professional School Counseling. 2006. Vol. 10(1_suppl). https://doi. org/10.1177/2156759X0601001S06
Popovych I., Blynova O., Zhuravlova A., Toba M., Tkach T., Zavatska N. Optimization of development and psycho-correction of social expectations of students of foreign philology. Revista Inclusiones. 2020. Vol. 7(SI). P. 23–38. https://www.revistainclusiones. org/index.php/inclu/article/view/1657
Popovych I., Hudimova A., Bokhonkova Yu., Savchuk O., Hoian I., Shevchenko N. Dispositional Mental States of Internally Displaced University Teachers Under Martial Law: Gender Differences. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2023a. Vol. 14(2). P. 171–187. https://doi. org/10.15503/jecs2023.2.171.181
Popovych I., Plokhikh V., Hrys A., Pavliuk M., Nosov P., Zinchenko S. Operationalization of footballers’ emotional intelligence in the dimensions of motivational orientation: analysis based on the basic positions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023b. Vol. 23(3). P. 772–781. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.03095
Preckel F., Baudson T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt S., Glock, S. Gifted and Maladjusted? Implicit Attitudes and Automatic Associations Related to Gifted Children. American Educational Research Journal. 2015. Vol. 52(6). P. 1160–1184. https://doi. org/10.3102/0002831215596413
Prokhorenko L., Popovych I., Sokolova H., Chumaieva Yu., Kosenko Yu., Razumovska T., Zasenko V. Gender differentiation of self-regulating mental states of athletes with disabilities: comparative analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023. Vol. 23(2). P. 349–359. https://doi.org/10.7752/ jpes.2023.02042
Robbins J., Wells J. M. Meet the Tutors: Student Expectations, Tutor Perspectives, and Some Recommendations for Sharing Information about Tutors Online. Writing Center Journal. 2022. Vol. 40(3). P. 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1005
Suarta I. M., Noortyani R., Yarsama K., Adhiti I. A. I. The role of Teachers’ Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Competencies in Enhancing Students’ Engagement and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies. 2022. Vol. 9(1). P. 244–264. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1025
Subotnik R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F. C. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education:A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2011. Vol. 12(1). P. 3–54. https://doi. org/10.1177/1529100611418056
Vargas-Hernández J. G. Kariyev A. D. Didactic Strategies for Meaningful Learning. In R. González-Lezcano (Ed.). Advancing STEM Education and Innovation in a Time of Distance Learning (pp. 47–72). IGI Global. 2023a. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684- 5053-6.ch003
Vargas-Hernández J. G., Vargas-González O. C., Castañeda- Burciaga S., Kariyev A. D. Meaningful Learning Didactic Strategies in Higher Education. In: N. Alias, S. Syed-Aris, H. Hashim (Eds.). Cases on Responsive and Responsible Learning in Higher Education (pp. 54–72). IGI Global. 2023b. https://doi. org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6076-4.ch004
Walsh W. B., Flores L. Y., Hartung P. J., Leong F. T. L. Introduction: Integrating Theory, Culture, and Practice in Career Psychology. Career Psychology: Models, Concepts, and Counseling for Meaningful Employment: American Psychological Association, 2023. P. 3–12. URL: https://www.apa.org/pubs/ books/3837982-sample-pages.pdf
Winner E. Giftedness: Current Theory and Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2000. Vol. 9(5). P. 153–156. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-8721.00082
Zinchenko S. M., Ben A. P., Nosov P.S., Popovych I. S., Mamenko P. P., Mateychuk V. M. Improving the Accuracy and Reliability of Automatic Vessel Moution Control System. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control. 2020. Vol. 2(53). P. 183–195. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2020-2-18
Published
2024-05-01
Pages
164-183
How to Cite
Kariyev A., Orazbayeva F., Imankulova M., & Vasileva V. (2024). Research on Academic Giftedness of Future Teachers. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (11), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2024-11-9
Section
PEDAGOGICAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY