Innovation in the Professional Formation and Development of Future Teachers

Keywords: educational process, professional training, professional readiness, primary school teacher, university, distance learning, digital educational environment.

Abstract

The aim of the empirical research is to find out and substantiate the psychological content parameters of innovation in the professional formation and development of future teachers. The tasks are: determination of correlations of parameters of higher education students’ professional readiness for innovative activities with independent variables; finding statistically significant differences between the respondents in the samples of bachelors (group I) and master’s students (group II); comparison of the researched groups with high and low levels of the formation of the coefficients of innovation. Methods: retrospective analysis, generalization, systematization and comparison; the author’s questionnaire “Professional readiness of students for innovative activities” (RIA) (Tsiuniak, 2021); method “Diagnostics of the motivational structure of the personality” (DMSP) (Milman, 1990); method “Teacher’s abilities for creative self-development” (TACSd) (Nikishina, 2009). Results. It was found that there are no statistically significant differences in the determined parameters between the samples of bachelors (group I) and master’s students (group II). A positive tendency was stated in group I in the quantitative coefficient of innovation QCI (М=.68; SD=.22; Me=.68) and in group II – the qualitative coefficient of innovation Q2CI (М=.62; SD=.23; Me=. 61). It was established that the coefficients of innovation have four statistically significant correlations with independent variables: creative activity, social usefulness, active self-development, stopped self-development (р<.050; р<.010). Significant differences were found in the studied groups with high and low levels of formation of the quantitative coefficient of innovation (QCI) and the qualitative coefficient of innovation (Q2CI). Discussion and сonclusions. It was explained that the statistically significant correlation between Q2CI and the “social usefulness” parameter is evidence that the subjects are ready to bear social responsibility for innovation, take a mature social position and work for the long term. The obtained empirical results should be taken into account by the organizers of the educational process and the guarantors of specialized educational and scientific programs, who are responsible for future teachers’ academic and professional training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggadwita G., Indarti N., Ratten V. Changes in Indonesian private universities educational practices in the post COVID-19 environment. The International Journal of Management Education. 2024. Vol. 22(1). E-100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijme.2023.100905
Amedu C., Ohene-Botwe B. (2024). Harnessing the benefits of ChatGPT for radiography education: A discussion paper. Radiography. 2024. 30(1). P. 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. radi.2023.11.009
Blynova O., Popovych I., Hulias I., Radul S., Borozentseva T., Strilets-Babenko O., Minenko O. Psychological safety of the educational space in the structure of motivational orientation of female athletes: a comparative analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022. Vol. 22(11). P. 2723–2732. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11346
Buerkle A., O’Dell A., Matharu H., Buerkle L., Ferreira P. Recommendations to align higher education teaching with the UN sustainability goals – A scoping survey. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2023. Vol. 5. 100280. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100280
Halian I., Popovych I., Hulias I., Serbin Iy., Vyshnevska O., Kovalchuk Z., Pyslar A. Correlation between personality traits of young athletes and their level of self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023a. Vol. 23(5). P. 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.05140
Halian I., Popovych I., Vovk V., Kariyev A., Poleshchuk L., Halian O. Correlation of the coach’s qualities and junior athletes’ self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023b. Vol. 23(7). P 1621– 1630. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.07199
Ilomäki L., Lakkala M., Kallunki V., Mundy D., Romero M., Romeu T., Gouseti A. Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review. Review of Education. 2023. Vol. 11. e3425. https://doi. org/10.1002/rev3.3425
Jomtarak R., Faikhamta C., Prasoplarb T., Lertdechapat K. CiRA-Core: The Connector for Developer Teachers and User Teachers to Artificial Intelligence. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Wang F. L., Paoprasert N., Charnsethikul P., Li K. C., Phusavat K. (eds) Technology in Education. Innovative Practices for the New Normal. ICTE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2024. Vol. 1974. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99- 8255-4_2
Machynska N., Yaremchuk N., Korniat V., Derkach Y., Sirant N., Lozynska S. Research of readiness of pedagogical workers for innovations. Amazonia Investiga. 2022. Vol. 11(51), 50–60. https://doi. org/10.34069/AI/2022.51.03.5
Mahsan I. P., Yeh L. H., Arif H. A., Nor N. M., Ladin C. A. ARTech Review: E-Learning of Visual Arts Education. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 2023. Vol. 33(2). P. 40–54. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset. 33.2.4054
Мильман В. Э. Метод изучения мотивационной сферы личности. Практикум по психодиагностике. Психодиагностика мотивации и саморегуляции. М., 1990. С. 23–43. https://b.eruditor.link/file/1605138/
Нікішина Т. Застосування технології творчого самовираження у формуванні готовності педагога до інноваційної інноваційної діяльності (аспект післядипломної педагогічної освіти). Вісник Львівського університету. 2009. № 25(2). С. 117–124. http:// dx.doi.org/10.30970/vpe.2009.25.5139
Pečiuliauskienė P., Kaminskienė L. Lehtinen E. Science teachers’ collaborative innovative activities: the role of professional development and professional experience. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023. Vol. 10. P. 324. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599- 023-01833-5
Popovych I., Zavatskyi V., Tsiuniak O., Nosov P., Zinchenko S., Mateichuk V., Zavatskyi Yu., Blynova O. Research on the Types of Pre-game Expectations in the Athletes of Sports Games. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020. Vol. 20(1). P. 43–52. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.01006
Popovych I., Halian I., Lialiuk G., Chopyk R., Karpenko Ye., Melnyk Yu. Research of young female handball players’ self-actualizing mental states. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022. Vol. 22(7). P. 1599– 1607. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.07201
Suchikova Y., Tsybuliak N. Universities without walls: global trend v. Ukraine’s reality. Nature. 2023. Vol. 614. P. 413. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586- 023-00380-y
Sultanova L., Tsiuniak O., Milto L., Zheludenko M., Lyktei L., Petrenko L., Uchitel A. The potential of Google Classroom web service for lecturers of higher educational establishments under pandemic conditions. 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 346−365. URL:http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2879/paper19.pdf
Tavrovetska N., Popovych I., Savchuk O., Piletskа L., Lappo V., Abramian N., Zahrai L. Research on risk inclination of young female athletes in the dimensions of life orientations. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023. Vol. 23(4). P. 868–877. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.04110
Цюняк О. П. Професійна підготовка майбутніх педагогів засобами дистанційного навчання в умовах карантину. Освіта дорослих: теорія, досвід, перспективи. 2020. Том. 17. № 1. С. 106–115. DOI: https://doi. org/10.35387/od.1(17).2020.106-115
Цюняк О. П. Формування емоційної культури у майбутніх учителів початкової школи у період війни. Імідж сучасного педагога. 2023. №3(204). С. 48–51. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729- 2022-3(204)-48-51
Цюняк О. Професійна підготовка майбутніх вчителів початкових класів в умовах цифрової трансформації освіти. Івано-Франківськ: Кушнір Г. М. 2021. 316 с. URL: http://hdl.handle. net/123456789/11656
Tsiuniak O., Pyslar A., Lialiuk G., Bondarenko V., Kovtun O., Los O., Popovych I. Research of interdependence of variables and factor structure of masters’ readiness for innovative pedagogical activity. Revista Inclusiones. 2020. Vol. 7(3). P. 427–452. URL: https://www.revistainclusiones.org/index. php/inclu/article/view/1645
Yaremchuk N. Distance learning in the system of professional training of primary school teachers: retrospective analysis. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice. 2022. Vol. 1, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2022.1.13
Золотарьова Г. М. Інноваційна педагогічна діяльність як рушійна сила розвитку науки та освіти України. Scientific Notes of the Pedagogical Department. 2015. № 24. С. 79–85. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/pedagogy/article/ view/3880
Published
2024-05-01
Pages
143-163
How to Cite
Tsiuniak O., Yaremchuk N., Haliuka O., & Prots M. (2024). Innovation in the Professional Formation and Development of Future Teachers. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (11), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2024-11-8
Section
PEDAGOGICAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY