Future psychologists’ dispositional predictors of psychological well-being under martial law
Abstract
The dispositional determination of the person’s psychological well-being in the context of emergencies was the focus of the article’s empirical investigation and theoretical justification. The purpose of the study was to clarify how, under martial law, the Big Five traits and the elements of a person’s psychological well-being correlate to one another. Methods:testing using M. Klimanska & I. Haletska’s (2019)Ukrainian adaptation of the short, five-factor TIPI-UKR questionnaire, S. Karskanova’s (2011) adaptation of “Scale of psychological well-being” by К. Ryff; survey;as well as descriptive statistics, factor analyses, correlation analyses, and structural interpretation of the data. Results. The empirical study’s entire sample comprised 48 female first-year Psychology students (the first group), 40 of them (83.3%, the second group)were extremely severely affected by the full-scale Russian invasion. In contrast to the second group, where the correlation was weaker and insufficient, extroversion was generally found to have a strong positive relationship with all aspects of psychological well-being. Yet, among the members of the second group, the value of openness to new experiences and a slightly lower level of conscientiousness was increasing. The Big Five traits’ factor analysis demonstrated the existence of integral personal dispositions that accounted for64.55% of the variance in the factors affecting psychological well-being. Stability, which was a combination of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability, was connected to an individual’s ability to transcend their own values, while plasticity, which was a combination of extroversion and openness to new experiences, was connected to the operational and instrumental equipment of the disposition. Conclusions. Extroversion and openness to new experiences(the general factor “plasticity”), which under the influence of chronic stress led to the structural restructuring of the individual’s adaptive resources, have been shown to be the most significant predictors of the psychological well-being of future psychologists in the conditions of martial law.
Downloads
References
Черенщикова Д. Аксіокорекція педагогічного спілкування у вищих навчальних закладах засобами позитивної психотерапії. Психологія особистості. 2012. № 1 (3). С. 184-194. https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=uk&user=rc_xoFQAAAAJ&citation_for_view=rc_xoFQAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C
Chykhantsova, O. A. A person’s quality of life and features of its measurement. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2020. № 4. P. 11-28. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2020-4-1
Costa JR, Paul T.; McCrae, Robert R. The NEO Inventories as instruments of psychological theory. The Oxford handbook of the five factor model. 2017. Р. 11-37. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-30849-002
Costa JR, Paul T.; MCCRAE, Robert R. The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (neo-pi-r). Sage Publications, Inc. 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9
DeNeve K. M., Cooper H. The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin. 1998. Vol. 124 (2). Р. 197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
DeYoung, Colin G. Toward a theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry. 2010. Vol. 21 (1). Р. 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003648674
DeYoung, Colin G.; Peterson, Jordan B.; Higgins, Daniel M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual differences. 2002. Vol. 33 (4). Р. 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
Diener, Ed. Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin. 1984. Vol. 95 (3). Р. 542. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, Ed; Chan, Micaela Y. Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being. 2011. Vol. 3 (1). Р. 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
Fel, S.; Niewiadomska, I.; Lenart-Kłoś, K. People in the Face of Modern Warfare: Relationships Between Resource Distribution and Behaviour of Participants in the Hostilities in Ukraine. V&R unipress. 2022. https://www.vandenhoeck-ruprecht-verlage.com/detail/index/sArticle/57909
Fromm, Erich. On disobedience and other essays. 1981. https://philpapers.org/rec/FROODA
Graziano, William G.; Eisenberg, Nancy. Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press. 1997. Р. 795-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50031-7
Hudimova A. Kh. Psychological well-being and social media users’ behavioral online patterns in everyday life and during COVID-19 pandemic. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2021. № 5. P. 133-147. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2021-5-9
Hulias, I. A., Hoian, I. M. Explication of factors of the axiopsychological design of life achievements of modern youth. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2022. № 7. P. 41-57. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-7-4
Hulias, I.; Karpenko, Z. Axiopsychological Differences of Men’s and Women’s Gender Displays in Modern Ukraine. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2022. Vol. 13 (1). P. 351-368. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.351.368
Judge, Timothy A., et al. Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of applied psychology. 2013. Vol. 98 (6). Р. 875. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0033901
Карсканова, С. В. Опитувальник “Шкали психологічного благополуччя” К. Ріфф: процес та результати адаптації. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2011. № 1. С. 1-10. https://www.academia.edu/4482649/%D0%9E%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA
Кліманська, М.; Галецька, І. Українська адаптація короткого п’ятифакторного опитувальника особистості TIPI (TIPI-UKR). Psychological journal. 2019. № 5 (9). С. 57-76. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2019.5.9.4
Khraban T. E. Adoption of coping strategies by Ukrainian civilians in the first fifteen days after the outbreak of military conflict in 2022. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2022. Vol. 7. P. 59–74. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-7-5
Leszko, M., Iwański, R., Jarzębińska, A. The relationship between personality traits and coping styles among first-time and recurrent prisoners in Poland. Frontiers in psychology. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 2969. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02969
Lewis, Elisa G.; Cardwell, Jacqueline M. The big five personality traits, perfectionism and their association with mental health among UK students on professional degree programmes. BMC psychology. 2020. Vol. 8 (1). Р. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00423-3
Ma F., Shevchenko, R. P., Karhina N. V. Student youth representation of psychological well-being: results of content analysis of works. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2020. Vol. 3. P. 44-55. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2020-3-3
Markon, Kristian E.; Krueger, Robert F.; Watson, David. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2005. Vol. 88 (1). Р. 139. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139
Maslow, A. H., Mintz, N. L. Effects of esthetic surroundings: I. Initial effects of three esthetic conditions upon perceiving “energy” and “well-being” in faces. The Journal of Psychology. 1956. Vol. 41 (2). Р. 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1956.9713000
Modersitzki, Nick, et al. Who is impacted? Personality predicts individual differences in psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2021. Vol. 12 (6). Р. 1110-1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620952576
Orap, M. O., Akimova, N. V., Kalba, Ya. Ye. Subjective well-being and anxiety level during the COVID-2019 crisis: study in Ukrainian adolescence. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2021. Vol. 6. P. 28-39. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2021-6-3
Радчук, Г. Аксіопсихологія вищої школи: монографія. Тернопіль: ТНПУ. 2014. 380 с. http://library.tnpu.edu.ua/index.php/presents/2014/96-individuals14/1249-radchyk
Ryff, Carol D.; Singer, Burton H. Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of happiness studies. 2008. Vol. 9. Р. 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Saveikiene, D., Volodarska, N. D. Conditions of effectiveness of methods of supporting women’s psychological well-being in situations of temporary relocation. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society. 2020. Vol. 3. P. 109-121. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2020-3-8
Schinka, John A.; Kinder, Bill N.; Kremer, Thomas. Research validity scales for the NEO--PI--R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1997. Vol. 68 (1). Р. 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6801_10
Schneider, Kirk J.; Pierson, J. Fraser; Bugental, James FT (ed.). The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice. Sage Publications. 2014. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-21337-000
Steel, Piers; Schmidt, Joseph; Shultz, Jonas. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin. 2008.
Vol. 134 (1). Р. 138. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
Sutin, Angelina R. Openness. 2017. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-30849-005
Weston, Sara J.; Jackson, Joshua J. How do people respond to health news? The role of personality traits. Psychology & Health. 2016. Vol. 31 (6). Р. 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1119274
Widiger, Thomas A. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of the five factor model. Oxford University Press. 2017. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-30849-000
World Medical Association, et al. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013. Vol. 310 (20). Р. 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001jama.2013.281053
Zaverukha, O., Popovych, I., Karpenko, Y., Kozmenko, O., Stelmakh, O., Borysenko, O., Kovalchuk, Z. Dynamics of Successful Formation of Professional Identity of Future Psychologists in Higher Education Institutions. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 2022. Vol. 14 (1). Р. 139-157. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1/511
Authors who publish with scientific journal agree to the following terms:
• All scientific papers may be freely copied and distributed on any medium and in any format, provided that the references to the initial data of the scientific work are indicated.
• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Creative Commons Attribution License .
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non- exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (institutional repository, your website, monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
