Limitation of psychological defense on the formation of students’ time perspective

Keywords: personality, psychological time, stress, protective response, learning activities


The purpose of the research is to determine the peculiaritiesof the formation of students’ time perspectiveof life given the intensity of the systematic applicationof various psychological defense mechanisms. Methods.42 students participated in the research. Standardizedtest methods were used to collect empirical data.Cluster analysis, correlation analysis, and Mann-WhitneyU-test contributed to the quantitative processingof empirical material. Results. It was found that studentswith a low tolerance for stress in terms of balance(U= 137.00; p=.049) and self-control (U=.001;p<.001) are more prone to systematic actualizationof the psychological defense of substitution, regression,and rationalization. It is determined that the systematicuse of psychological defense in students is associatedwith temporal orientations as follows: substitution correlateswith the past negative (Rs=.331; p=.033), fatalisticpresent (Rs=.309; p=.046), and future (Rs=-.314;p=.043); regression correlates with the past negative(Rs=.387; p=.011), present fatalistic (Rs=.374; p=.015), present hedonistic (Rs=.422; p=.005), and future (Rs=-.376; p=.014); rationalization correlates with the future(Rs=.444; p=.003). There were also direct links betweenthe denial of reality and the present hedonistic (Rs=.485;p=.001) with protective compensation and the fatalisticpresent (Rs=.456; p=.002). The findings indicatethat the study group lacks connections between temporalcompetence and the use of psychological defensemechanisms. At the same time, temporal competenceis inversely related to students’ orientation on the pastnegative (Rs=-.325; p=.036). Conclusions. Students’systematic application of the psychological defenseof substitution, regression, denial, and compensationis associated with time orientations on the past negative,present hedonistic, fatalism and shiftlessnesstoward current efforts in building the future. Students’active use of protective rationalization corresponds totheir natural orientation toward the future. However, itdoes not contribute to the complete of the componentsof the psychological time structure. Students’ systematicapplication of psychological defense mechanismsis not in line with their temporal competence.


Abulkhanova, K.A., Berezina, T.N. (2001). Vremia lichnosti i vremia zhizni [Personal time and life time]. SPb.: Aleteiia [in Russian]
Bajec, B. (2019). Relationship Between Time Perspective and Time Management Behaviours. PSIHOLOGIJA, 52(2), 197-215.
Cheban, Yu. V., Chebykin, O. Ya., Plokhikh, V. V., & Massanov, A. V. (2020). Emotional and volitional potential of self-mobilization in the organization of time perspective activity of highly qualified rowing athletes. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20 (SI 6), 3128-3137.
Cramer, P. (2003). Defense Mechanisms and Physiological Reactivity to Stress. Journal of Personality, 71, 221-244.
Frankl, V. (2012). Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Man in search of meaning]. Zaporozhe: Big-Press [in Russian]
Giuseppe, M., Gemignani, A., & Conversano, С. (2020). Psychological resources against the traumatic experience of COVID-19. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 85-87.
Granovskaia, R. M., & Bereznaia, I. Ia. (2020). Intuitsiia i iskusstvennyi intellekt [Intuition and artificial intelligence]. Kh.: Gumanitarnyi tsentr [in Russian]
Hulias, I. A., & Hoian, I. M. (2022). Explication of factors of the axiopsychological design of life achievements of modern youth. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society, 7, 41-57.
Plokhikh, V., Popovych, I., Koval, I., Stepanenko, L., Nosov, P., Zinchenko, S., Boiaryn, L., & Zavatskyi, V. (2022). Anticipatory Resource of Temporary Regulation of Sensorimotor Action. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(2), 01-21
Plokhikh, V., & Suponeva, L. (2021). Psykholohichni zakhysty v orhanizatsii chasovoi perspektyvy studentiv v umovakh COVID-obmezhen [Psychological defense in the organization of the time perspective of students under COVID-restrictions]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 3, 12-21. [in Ukraine]
Popovych, I. S., & Blynova, O. Ye. (2019). The Structure, Variables and Interdependence of the Factors of Mental States of Expectations in Students’ Academic and Professional Activities. The New Educational Review, 55(1), 293-306.
Popovych, I., Chervinska, I., Kazibekova, V., Vasylyk, V., Verbeschuk, S., & Gniezdilova, V. (2022). Young athletes’ time perspective as a factor in the development of sports motivation. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(10), 2427-2435.
Popovych, I., Blynova, O., Savchuk, O., Zasenko, V., & Prokhorenko, L. (2020). Expectations of a winning result in women’s handball team: comparison of different age groups. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(5), 2709-2717.
Przepiorka, A., Siu, N. Y., Szcześniak, M., Timoszyk‑Tomczak, C., Le, J. J., & Muсoz, M. P. (2020). The Relation Between Personality, Time Perspective and Positive Orientation in Chile, Hong Kong, and Poland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1081-1101.
Simonenko, V. B., Magaeva, S. V., & Fisun, A. Ya. (2013). Psihosomaticheskij faktor v iskhodah ekstremal’nyh situacij [Psychosomatic factor in ascending extreme situations]. (2d ed). M.: BINOM [in Russian].
How to Cite
PlokhikhV. V. (2022). Limitation of psychological defense on the formation of students’ time perspective. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (8), 39-55.