Structural and dynamic peculiarities of the sense of ownership experiencing during the COVID-19 pandemic quarantine
Abstract
The article contains the results of empirical studyof structural-dynamic peculiarities of the sense of ownershipexperiencing under the conditions of COVID-19quarantine restrictions, which aimed at identifyingand comparison of the peculiarities of how individualsexperience a sense of ownership towards variousproperty targets during the quarantine restrictionsand after some time of the restriction lifting. The paperalso addressed the identification of such structural-dynamic peculiarities in terms of age and genderof the respondents. There was also an attempt to findthe connection between the manifestation of the senseof ownership during the quarantine in various domainsand the level of psychological wellbeing of the population.The research method was based on a two-phaseonline survey: 1) May 2020 (the period of increased quarantine restrictions and aggravation of psychologicalexperiences in humans); 2) July 2020 (a month afterthe restrictions had decreased) among 363 individuals,41.8% male and 58.2% female. The questionnaireincluded open questions, as well as metric scales thatrelated to the peculiarities of the sense of ownershipexperiencing during the quarantine, and standardizedPsychological Wellbeing Scale. The desire to own a vehiclewas the primary one, especially among females, whichrelated to substantially low rate of females who owneda car. In addition, the findings indicate that another primaryconcern was to possess enough funds and financial‘safety bag’ to have opportunities to overcomethe uneasy period together with the risk to lose job orincome. In order to find other resources for stabilizationand safety, the attention of the population was refocusedat the targets of ownership which they still were able tocontrol, including body care and physical exercises, workor learning area management, creation and personalizationof leisure environment and solitude. In addition,there was a rethinking of the value of costly things thatlost their actuality and meaningfulness, as well as socialcontacts, including close people, the meaningfulnesshas substantially increased and stayed at the same leveleven after the quarantine restrictions had been lifted. Itcan be observed that unstable periods in society, such aspandemic and quarantine restrictions, create conditionsfor restructuring of the basic sense of personality safety.
Downloads
References
2. Титаренко Т. М. Посттравматичне життєтворення: способи досягнення психологічного благополуччя : монографія. Національна академія педагогічних наук України, Інститут соціальної та політичної психології. Кропивницький: Імекс-ЛТД. 2020. 160 c.
3. Clair R., Gordon M., Kroon M., Reilly C. The effects of social isolation on well-being and life satisfaction during pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021. P. 1-6. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00710-3
4. Javed B., Sarwer A., Soto E. B., Mashwani Z. R. The coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic's impact on mental health. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2020. P. 1-4. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3008
5. Pietrabissa G., Simpson S. G. Psychological Consequences of Social Isolation During COVID-19 Outbreak. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. №11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02201
6. Zacher H., Rudolph C. W. Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 2021, 76(1), P. 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000702
7. Noguti V., Bokeyar A. L. Who am I? The relationship between self-concept uncertainty and materialism. International Journal of Psychology. 2014. №49 (5). P. 323-333. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12031
8. Pierce J. L., Kostova T., Dirks K. T. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology. 2003. №7(1). P. 84-107. DOI: 10.1037//1089-2680.7.1.84
9. Губеладзе І. Г. Соціальні практики володіння як простір реалізації почуття власності. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології. 2020. №46 (49). C. 242-250. DOI: 10.33120/ssj.vi46(49).173
10. Губеладзе І. Г. Почуття власності як соціально-психологічний феномен: концептуалізація поняття. Наукові студії із соціальної та політичної психології. 2019. №43 (46). C. 141-148. DOI: 10.33120/ssj.vi43(46)
11. Каліщук С.М. Концептуалізація екзистенціально-системної моделі реорганізації “картини світу” особистості: введення онтологічних домінант. Інсайт: психологічні виміри суспільства. 2020. № 3. C. 11-27. DOI: 10.32999/2663-970X/2020-3-1
12. Чиханцова, О.А. Життєстійкість як психологічний ресурс адаптації особистості. Інсайт: психологічні виміри суспільства. 2020. № 4. С. 11-28. DOI: 10.32999/2663-970X/2020-4-1
13. Kirk C. P., Rifkin L. S. I’ll Trade You Diamonds for Toilet Paper: Consumer Reacting, Coping and Adapting Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. №117. P. 124-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.028
14. Фетискин Н. П. Социально-психологическая диагностика развития личности и малых групп. М: Изд-во Института Психотерапии. 2002. 490 с.
Authors who publish with scientific journal agree to the following terms:
• All scientific papers may be freely copied and distributed on any medium and in any format, provided that the references to the initial data of the scientific work are indicated.
• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Creative Commons Attribution License .
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non- exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (institutional repository, your website, monograph), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.