THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING EMPLOYEES

  • Olena Yevhenivna Blynova,
  • Konstantyn Oleksandrovych Kruhlov,
Keywords: psychological welfare, subjective welfare, social capital, personal resources, employees of the organization

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of the role and importance of the social capital in the psychological welfare of employees of the organization.

The aim: the study of the social capital influence on the psychological welfare of employees of the organization.

Methods. “Psychological welfare of the individual” by K. Riff in the adaptation of T. Shevelenkova and P. Fesenko by six scales: goals in life, positive relationships with others, personal growth, environment management, self-acceptance, autonomy. To measure the social capital as a certain set of resources that a person can get from his or her social network, the method “The questionnaire for measuring the social capital of the individual” by P. Styla in the adaptation of I. Semkiv was applied.

Results. The psychological welfare is defined as experiences and states that point to the completeness of self-realization of a person in specific living conditions. The social capital is understood as a person’s social network, which is based on emotionally positive, trusting relationships and affects the improvement of the psychological comfort level of an individual. It has been established that the largest number of correlated relationships among the social capital scales has the “socio-professional resource”. Such results show the direct dependence of personal growth on one's job availability, professional self-realization, productive communication with colleagues at work, ability to expand own social network, which is based on relationships of trust and mutual assistance. The fact is that the “productive skills” scale provides greater autonomy of the individual, that is, independence and self-sufficiency of the respondent, the ability to independently regulate his or her behaviour, which relies on one's capabilities and abilities in building the strategy of behaviour and determining the vector of one's life.

Conclusions. The most significant resources of the social capital in the studied group of employees of the organization are “socio-professional resource”, “productive skills”, “emotional resource”. It was found that there are interconnections between the social capital resources of the individual and the indicators of his or her psychological welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Blynova, E. E. (2017) Znachenie sotsialnogo kapitala dlia uspeshnoi integratsii v sotsiume vnutrenne peremeshchennykh lits [The importance of social capital for the successful integration of internally displaced persons in society] Lichnost v ekstremalnykh usloviiakh i krizisnykh situatsiiakh zhiznedeiatelnosti: Sbornik nauchnykh statei VII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsi – Personality in extreme conditions and crisis situations of life: Collection of scientific articles of the VII International scientific and practical conference, Vladivostok. 121-129. [in Russian]
2. Burde, P. (2002) Formy kapitala [Forms of capital]. Ekonomicheskaia sotsiologiia. – Economic sociology, 3(5). 60-74. [in Russian]
3. Sventsitskii, A. L., Pochebut, L. G., Kiloshenko, M. I., Kuznetsova, I. V., Mararitsa, L. V., Kazantseva , T. V. (2009) Sotsialnyi kapital i ego formirovanie: sotsialno-psikhologicheskii podkhod [Social capital and its formation: a socio-psychological approach] Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 12 – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 12, 3(2). 140–149. [in Russian]
4. Semkiv, I. I. (2015) Psykhometrychni pokaznyky ta adaptatsiia metodyky R. Styly «KPIKS» [Psychometric Indicators and Adaptation KPIKS of R. Styles]. Humanitarnyi visnyk Derzhavnoho vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody». Seriia : Psykholohiia – Humanitarian Bulletin of the State Higher Educational Institution "Pereyaslav-Khmelnitsky State Pedagogical University named after Grigory Skovoroda". Series: Psychology, 37. 136-146. [in Ukrainian]
5. Shamionov, R. M. (2004) Psikhologiia subieektivnogo blagopoluchiia lichnosti [Psychology of subjective well-being of personality]. Saratov. [in Russian]
6. Shevelenkova, T. D., Fesenko, P. P. (2005) Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti (obzor osnovnykh kontseptsii i metodika issledovaniia) [Psychological well-being of an individual (review of basic concepts and research methods)]. Psikhologicheskaia diagnostika – Psychological diagnosis, 3. 95–129. [in Russian]
7. Busseri, M. A., Sadava S. W. (2011) A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3). 290–314.
8. Chida, Y., Steptoe, A. (2008) Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70. 741–756.
9. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., Arora, R. (2010) Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1). 52–61.
10. Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L., Lyubomirsky, S. (2007) Health benefits: Metaanalytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1. 83–136.
11. Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., Ryff, C.D. (2002) Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82. 1007–1022.
12. Linley, P.A., Maltby, J., Woodc, A.M., Osborne, G., Hurling, R. (2009) Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47. 878–884.
13. Luhmann, M., Hofman, W., Eid, M., Lucas, R.E. Subjective Well-Being and Adaptation to Life Events: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3). 592–615.
14. Portes, A. (1998) Social Capital: Its Origins and Application in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24.
Published
2019-10-11
Pages
72-78
How to Cite
Blynova, O. Y., & Kruhlov, K. O. (2019). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING EMPLOYEES. Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society, (1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2019-1-11
Section
3. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY OF SOCIAL WORK